[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Dec 2007 17:44:02 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
> > Actually according to qemu's standard, one should use
> > cpu_physical_memory_write/ cpu_physical_memory_read functions.
> > This is true also for reading the ring values.
>
> Yes, and unfortunately, cpu_physical_memory_{read,write} are copy
> interfaces. We really don't want that for high speed I/O.
I really don't like doing direct access to guest ram without implementing a
proper API for zero-copy/scatter-gather access. There was a list thread about
this not so long ago.
Paul
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Anthony Liguori, 2007/12/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Anthony Liguori, 2007/12/04
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Dor Laor, 2007/12/04
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Anthony Liguori, 2007/12/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device,
Paul Brook <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Anthony Liguori, 2007/12/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Jamie Lokier, 2007/12/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Paul Brook, 2007/12/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Jamie Lokier, 2007/12/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Paul Brook, 2007/12/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Blue Swirl, 2007/12/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Jamie Lokier, 2007/12/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Anthony Liguori, 2007/12/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Rusty Russell, 2007/12/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] virtio network device, Anthony Liguori, 2007/12/11