|
From: | Anton D Kachalov |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Killing KQEMU |
Date: | Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:26:27 +0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1b4pre) Gecko/20090427 Thunderbird/3.0b3pre |
On 02.06.2009 07:52, Chris Frey wrote:
Hi, I feel that I should post here, for the simple reason that most QEMU users likely don't read this list, and have no idea that developers are striving to kill off a valued feature.
[...] Chris,I may suggest you to switch to VirtualBox / VirtualBox OSE that has more features (comparable to VmWare) if you're interested to use QEMU just to run some kind of OS. It's much faster than QEMU + kqemu. And more over, it's stable. Sometimes I have software fails (segfaults in Java JIT) with QEMU+kqemu, but VBox drives well.
If you're HW/FW developer, you doesn't need kqemu at all. Rgds, Anton
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |