Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 08/11] QMP: Port balloon command

[Avi Kivity]

On 06/27/2009 06:58 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>   So, IMHO both solutions (QMP and JSON) solves the problem and I
> would work on either one. I just would like that Anthony and Avi
> get in agreement, because the project will fail if it becomes
> one more difference between qemu and qemu-kvm.
>    

There's no danger of a diverging implementation in this case since no 
one is proposing to have different monitor protocols.  We just need to 
find the best protocol.  Anthony's looking for minimal churn for the 
existing monitor command set and for libvirt, while I am considering the 
additional effort for new commands and for new clients.  It really isn't 
very complicated, and the thread only got so long because the topic is 
relatively simple.  Post an RFC and a mile-long patchset about changing 
TCG to SSA form, and see how you get no replies.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function