[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit register
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:54:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:53:45PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> Just to recall the situation (again, please actually try it): if you
>>>> have to debug code that switches between 16/32 bit and 64 bit, you
>>>> _can't_ debug the 16 or 32 bit part as gdb will stumble and fall over
>>>> qemu sending 64-bit register layout for 16/32 bit code. That is a gdb
>>>> limitation, but this patch is about dealing with it until it's resolved
>>>> in gdb.
>>> Remind me why you can't just tell GDB that the target is 64-bit
>>> despite whatever file you've given it?
>> Because gdb mixes up arch capability and current operation mode on x86.
>> It always tries to disassemble according to the set arch. Moreover, it
>> will misinterpret the registers as being valid across all 64 bits, not
>> just 16 or 32. I haven't looked into further side effects, but I bet
>> there are more.
>
> On a 64-bit CPU in 16/32-bit mode, all 64 register bits _are_ valid
> aren't they? (But not useful, as far as I know. Unless there's a
> 64-bit equivalent to i386's "big real" modes and such).
I meant they are invalid in the sense that, e.g., 32 bit code will not
modify the bits 32..63, thus r*x may not always equal e*x.
But even more problematic is the fact that frame unwinding does not work
if gdb applies 64 bit mode while the target is doing something
completely different. A "set arch i386:x86-64" workaround for this
problem simply does not work.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Jan Kiszka, 2009/06/27
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Paul Brook, 2009/06/29
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Jan Kiszka, 2009/06/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Paul Brook, 2009/06/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Jan Kiszka, 2009/06/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Paul Brook, 2009/06/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Jan Kiszka, 2009/06/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Daniel Jacobowitz, 2009/06/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Jan Kiszka, 2009/06/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Jamie Lokier, 2009/06/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically,
Jan Kiszka <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Gerd Hoffmann, 2009/06/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Jan Kiszka, 2009/06/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/4] gdbstub: x86: Switch 64/32 bit registers dynamically, Paul Brook, 2009/06/29
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] gdbstub: x86: Support for setting segment registers, Jan Kiszka, 2009/06/27