|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] qdev/core: bus list |
Date: | Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:49:28 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320) |
Markus Armbruster wrote:
Paul Brook <address@hidden> writes:On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Markus Armbruster wrote:The address of the BusState is also a locally unique identifier. That doesn't mean it's a good thing to expose to the user.Paul Brook <address@hidden> writes:On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:* maintain a list of busses. * maintain bus numbers. * add function to find busses by type / name / number. * add monitor command to list busses.I still object to this patch. Busses should be identified by their location in the tree, not by number. PaulLocation in the tree can be uniquely identified by a number. Handy when all you want is enumerate the buses, and you don't really care where they're hanging out in the tree. Why should something like that not be done?PaulRed herring.
I don't think that's a very useful response.I think it's a perfectly valid suggestion that we should identify buses based on the their location in the tree to users verses a number generated based on some hashing algorithm.
A tree location has meaning to a user. A random integer doesn't. Regards, Anthony Liguori
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |