Re: [Qemu-devel] GPLv3 troubles

[nicolas.sauzede]

 Some files are not even listed, such as hw/vexpress.c, which seem to be GPL v2 (only)..
 

> > Message du 18/10/11 16:37
> > De : "Anthony Liguori" 
> > A : "Andreas Färber" 
> > Copie à : "Stefan Weil" , address@hidden, "Markus Armbruster" , "Blue Swirl" , "Max Filippov" , "Avi Kivity" , "Paolo Bonzini" 
> > Objet : Re: [Qemu-devel] GPLv3 troubles
> >
> > On 10/18/2011 09:33 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > > Am 18.10.2011 15:03, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> > >> Okay, let's get serious about it.  I set up the following wiki page for
> > >> coordination:
> > >>
> > >> http://wiki.qemu.org/Relicensing
> > >>
> > >> Please get the appropriate approval at Red Hat, and follow the
> > >> instructions on the wiki.  I'm in the process of getting approval at
> > >> IBM.  Between RH, IBM, and Blue, there's a pretty large chunk of files
> > >> that can be relicensed immediately.  It's probably best to tackle this
> > >> incrementally.
> > >
> > > Sounds like a plan, thanks.
> > >
> > > The file list still has some false positives. Might edit later.
> > > In block/ I noticed sheepdog.c and rbd.c that are GPLv2, too.
> > 
> > Yes, please edit the wiki.  I just attempted to post a strawman to get us started.
> > 
> > > A few files are completely lacking a license btw.
> > 
> > Yes, we'll have to list those separately, contact the original author to add a 
> > copyright statement+license, and get every contributor to SoB the change.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Anthony Liguori
> > 
> > > Andreas
> > >
> > 
> > 
> >