[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 06/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to write elf
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 06/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to write elf notes to core file |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:31:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
On 2012-02-09 04:24, Wen Congyang wrote:
> The core file contains register's value. These APIs write registers to
> core file, and them will be called in the following patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <address@hidden>
> ---
> cpu-all.h | 6 +
> target-i386/arch-dump.c | 243
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpu-all.h b/cpu-all.h
> index 4cd7fbb..efb5ba3 100644
> --- a/cpu-all.h
> +++ b/cpu-all.h
> @@ -526,8 +526,14 @@ int cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPUState *env, target_ulong addr,
>
> #if defined(TARGET_I386)
> void cpu_get_memory_mapping(MemoryMappingList *list, CPUState *env);
> +int cpu_write_elf64_note(int fd, CPUState *env, int cpuid,
> + target_phys_addr_t *offset);
> +int cpu_write_elf32_note(int fd, CPUState *env, int cpuid,
> + target_phys_addr_t *offset);
Again, some HAVE_XXX would be nicer. Maybe you put the whole block under
HAVE_GUEST_CORE_DUMP or so.
Is writing to file descriptor generic enough? What if we want to dump
via QMP, letting the receiver side decide about where to write it?
> #else
> #define cpu_get_memory_mapping(list, env)
> +#define cpu_write_elf64_note(fd, env, cpuid, offset) ({ -1; })
> +#define cpu_write_elf32_note(fd, env, cpuid, offset) ({ -1; })
> #endif
>
> #endif /* CPU_ALL_H */
> diff --git a/target-i386/arch-dump.c b/target-i386/arch-dump.c
> index 2e921c7..4c0ff77 100644
> --- a/target-i386/arch-dump.c
> +++ b/target-i386/arch-dump.c
> @@ -11,8 +11,11 @@
> *
> */
>
> +#include <elf.h>
Does this create a new dependency and break non-Linux hosts? Can you
pull the required bits into qemu's elf.h then?
> +
> #include "cpu.h"
> #include "cpu-all.h"
> +#include "monitor.h"
>
> /* PAE Paging or IA-32e Paging */
> static void walk_pte(MemoryMappingList *list, target_phys_addr_t
> pte_start_addr,
> @@ -252,3 +255,243 @@ void cpu_get_memory_mapping(MemoryMappingList *list,
> CPUState *env)
> walk_pde2(list, pde_addr, env->a20_mask, pse);
> }
> }
> +
> +#ifdef TARGET_X86_64
> +typedef struct {
> + target_ulong r15, r14, r13, r12, rbp, rbx, r11, r10;
> + target_ulong r9, r8, rax, rcx, rdx, rsi, rdi, orig_rax;
> + target_ulong rip, cs, eflags;
> + target_ulong rsp, ss;
> + target_ulong fs_base, gs_base;
> + target_ulong ds, es, fs, gs;
> +} x86_64_user_regs_struct;
> +
> +static int x86_64_write_elf64_note(int fd, CPUState *env, int id,
> + target_phys_addr_t *offset)
> +{
> + x86_64_user_regs_struct regs;
> + Elf64_Nhdr *note;
> + char *buf;
> + int descsz, note_size, name_size = 5;
> + const char *name = "CORE";
> + int ret;
> +
> + regs.r15 = env->regs[15];
> + regs.r14 = env->regs[14];
> + regs.r13 = env->regs[13];
> + regs.r12 = env->regs[12];
> + regs.r11 = env->regs[11];
> + regs.r10 = env->regs[10];
> + regs.r9 = env->regs[9];
> + regs.r8 = env->regs[8];
> + regs.rbp = env->regs[R_EBP];
> + regs.rsp = env->regs[R_ESP];
> + regs.rdi = env->regs[R_EDI];
> + regs.rsi = env->regs[R_ESI];
> + regs.rdx = env->regs[R_EDX];
> + regs.rcx = env->regs[R_ECX];
> + regs.rbx = env->regs[R_EBX];
> + regs.rax = env->regs[R_EAX];
> + regs.rip = env->eip;
> + regs.eflags = env->eflags;
> +
> + regs.orig_rax = 0; /* FIXME */
> + regs.cs = env->segs[R_CS].selector;
> + regs.ss = env->segs[R_SS].selector;
> + regs.fs_base = env->segs[R_FS].base;
> + regs.gs_base = env->segs[R_GS].base;
> + regs.ds = env->segs[R_DS].selector;
> + regs.es = env->segs[R_ES].selector;
> + regs.fs = env->segs[R_FS].selector;
> + regs.gs = env->segs[R_GS].selector;
> +
> + descsz = 336; /* sizeof(prstatus_t) is 336 on x86_64 box */
> + note_size = ((sizeof(Elf64_Nhdr) + 3) / 4 + (name_size + 3) / 4 +
> + (descsz + 3) / 4) * 4;
> + note = g_malloc(note_size);
> +
> + memset(note, 0, note_size);
> + note->n_namesz = cpu_to_le32(name_size);
> + note->n_descsz = cpu_to_le32(descsz);
> + note->n_type = cpu_to_le32(NT_PRSTATUS);
> + buf = (char *)note;
> + buf += ((sizeof(Elf64_Nhdr) + 3) / 4) * 4;
> + memcpy(buf, name, name_size);
> + buf += ((name_size + 3) / 4) * 4;
> + memcpy(buf + 32, &id, 4); /* pr_pid */
> + buf += descsz - sizeof(x86_64_user_regs_struct)-sizeof(target_ulong);
> + memcpy(buf, ®s, sizeof(x86_64_user_regs_struct));
> +
> + lseek(fd, *offset, SEEK_SET);
> + ret = write(fd, note, note_size);
> + g_free(note);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + *offset += note_size;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +typedef struct {
> + uint32_t ebx, ecx, edx, esi, edi, ebp, eax;
> + unsigned short ds, __ds, es, __es;
> + unsigned short fs, __fs, gs, __gs;
> + uint32_t orig_eax, eip;
> + unsigned short cs, __cs;
> + uint32_t eflags, esp;
> + unsigned short ss, __ss;
> +} x86_user_regs_struct;
> +
> +static int x86_write_elf64_note(int fd, CPUState *env, int id,
> + target_phys_addr_t *offset)
> +{
> + x86_user_regs_struct regs;
> + Elf64_Nhdr *note;
> + char *buf;
> + int descsz, note_size, name_size = 5;
> + const char *name = "CORE";
> + int ret;
> +
> + regs.ebp = env->regs[R_EBP] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.esp = env->regs[R_ESP] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.edi = env->regs[R_EDI] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.esi = env->regs[R_ESI] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.edx = env->regs[R_EDX] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.ecx = env->regs[R_ECX] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.ebx = env->regs[R_EBX] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.eax = env->regs[R_EAX] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.eip = env->eip & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.eflags = env->eflags & 0xffffffff;
> +
> + regs.cs = env->segs[R_CS].selector;
> + regs.__cs = 0;
> + regs.ss = env->segs[R_SS].selector;
> + regs.__ss = 0;
> + regs.ds = env->segs[R_DS].selector;
> + regs.__ds = 0;
> + regs.es = env->segs[R_ES].selector;
> + regs.__es = 0;
> + regs.fs = env->segs[R_FS].selector;
> + regs.__fs = 0;
> + regs.gs = env->segs[R_GS].selector;
> + regs.__gs = 0;
> +
> + descsz = 144; /* sizeof(prstatus_t) is 144 on x86 box */
> + note_size = ((sizeof(Elf64_Nhdr) + 3) / 4 + (name_size + 3) / 4 +
> + (descsz + 3) / 4) * 4;
> + note = g_malloc(note_size);
> +
> + memset(note, 0, note_size);
> + note->n_namesz = cpu_to_le32(name_size);
> + note->n_descsz = cpu_to_le32(descsz);
> + note->n_type = cpu_to_le32(NT_PRSTATUS);
> + buf = (char *)note;
> + buf += ((sizeof(Elf64_Nhdr) + 3) / 4) * 4;
> + memcpy(buf, name, name_size);
> + buf += ((name_size + 3) / 4) * 4;
> + memcpy(buf + 24, &id, 4); /* pr_pid */
> + buf += descsz - sizeof(x86_user_regs_struct)-4;
> + memcpy(buf, ®s, sizeof(x86_user_regs_struct));
> +
> + lseek(fd, *offset, SEEK_SET);
> + ret = write(fd, note, note_size);
> + g_free(note);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + *offset += note_size;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int x86_write_elf32_note(int fd, CPUState *env, int id,
> + target_phys_addr_t *offset)
> +{
> + x86_user_regs_struct regs;
> + Elf32_Nhdr *note;
> + char *buf;
> + int descsz, note_size, name_size = 5;
> + const char *name = "CORE";
> + int ret;
> +
> + regs.ebp = env->regs[R_EBP] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.esp = env->regs[R_ESP] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.edi = env->regs[R_EDI] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.esi = env->regs[R_ESI] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.edx = env->regs[R_EDX] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.ecx = env->regs[R_ECX] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.ebx = env->regs[R_EBX] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.eax = env->regs[R_EAX] & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.eip = env->eip & 0xffffffff;
> + regs.eflags = env->eflags & 0xffffffff;
> +
> + regs.cs = env->segs[R_CS].selector;
> + regs.__cs = 0;
> + regs.ss = env->segs[R_SS].selector;
> + regs.__ss = 0;
> + regs.ds = env->segs[R_DS].selector;
> + regs.__ds = 0;
> + regs.es = env->segs[R_ES].selector;
> + regs.__es = 0;
> + regs.fs = env->segs[R_FS].selector;
> + regs.__fs = 0;
> + regs.gs = env->segs[R_GS].selector;
> + regs.__gs = 0;
> +
> + descsz = 144; /* sizeof(prstatus_t) is 144 on x86 box */
> + note_size = ((sizeof(Elf32_Nhdr) + 3) / 4 + (name_size + 3) / 4 +
> + (descsz + 3) / 4) * 4;
> + note = g_malloc(note_size);
> +
> + memset(note, 0, note_size);
> + note->n_namesz = cpu_to_le32(name_size);
> + note->n_descsz = cpu_to_le32(descsz);
> + note->n_type = cpu_to_le32(NT_PRSTATUS);
> + buf = (char *)note;
> + buf += ((sizeof(Elf32_Nhdr) + 3) / 4) * 4;
> + memcpy(buf, name, name_size);
> + buf += ((name_size + 3) / 4) * 4;
> + memcpy(buf + 24, &id, 4); /* pr_pid */
> + buf += descsz - sizeof(x86_user_regs_struct)-4;
> + memcpy(buf, ®s, sizeof(x86_user_regs_struct));
> +
> + lseek(fd, *offset, SEEK_SET);
> + ret = write(fd, note, note_size);
> + g_free(note);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + *offset += note_size;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int cpu_write_elf64_note(int fd, CPUState *env, int cpuid,
> + target_phys_addr_t *offset)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +#ifdef TARGET_X86_64
> + bool lma = !!(first_cpu->hflags & HF_LMA_MASK);
> +
> + if (lma) {
> + ret = x86_64_write_elf64_note(fd, env, cpuid, offset);
> + } else {
> +#endif
> + ret = x86_write_elf64_note(fd, env, cpuid, offset);
> +#ifdef TARGET_X86_64
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int cpu_write_elf32_note(int fd, CPUState *env, int cpuid,
> + target_phys_addr_t *offset)
> +{
> + return x86_write_elf32_note(fd, env, cpuid, offset);
> +}
Minor nit: I think this wrapping is not needed, just fold
x86_write_elf32_note into this function.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 04/16 v6] target-i386: implement cpu_get_memory_mapping(), (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 05/16 v6] Add API to get memory mapping, Wen Congyang, 2012/02/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 05/16 v6] Add API to get memory mapping, Jan Kiszka, 2012/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 05/16 v6] Add API to get memory mapping, Wen Congyang, 2012/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 05/16 v6] Add API to get memory mapping, Jan Kiszka, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 05/16 v6] Add API to get memory mapping, Wen Congyang, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 05/16 v6] Add API to get memory mapping, HATAYAMA Daisuke, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 05/16 v6] Add API to get memory mapping, Jan Kiszka, 2012/02/15
[Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 06/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to write elf notes to core file, Wen Congyang, 2012/02/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 06/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to write elf notes to core file,
Jan Kiszka <=
[Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 07/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to add extra memory mapping, Wen Congyang, 2012/02/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 07/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to add extra memory mapping, Jan Kiszka, 2012/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 07/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to add extra memory mapping, Wen Congyang, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 07/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to add extra memory mapping, Jan Kiszka, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 07/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to add extra memory mapping, Wen Congyang, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 07/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to add extra memory mapping, Jan Kiszka, 2012/02/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 07/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to add extra memory mapping, Wen Congyang, 2012/02/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 07/16 v6] target-i386: Add API to add extra memory mapping, HATAYAMA Daisuke, 2012/02/17
[Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 08/16 v6] target-i386: add API to get dump info, Wen Congyang, 2012/02/08