[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash co
From: |
Peter Crosthwaite |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:17:19 +1000 |
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Kuo-Jung Su <address@hidden> wrote:
> \
>
> 2013/2/7 Peter Crosthwaite <address@hidden>:
>> Hi Kuo-Jung,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Kuo-Jung Su <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> From: Kuo-Jung Su <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> The FTSPI020 is an integrated SPI Flash controller
>>> which supports upto 4 flash chips.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kuo-Jung Su <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>> hw/arm/Makefile.objs | 1 +
>>> hw/arm/faraday_a369.c | 12 ++
>>> hw/arm/ftspi020.c | 345
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> hw/arm/ftspi020.h | 50 +++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 408 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 hw/arm/ftspi020.c
>>> create mode 100644 hw/arm/ftspi020.h
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/arm/Makefile.objs b/hw/arm/Makefile.objs
>>> index 508335a..7178b5d 100644
>>> --- a/hw/arm/Makefile.objs
>>> +++ b/hw/arm/Makefile.objs
>>> @@ -52,3 +52,4 @@ obj-y += ftgmac100.o
>>> obj-y += ftlcdc200.o
>>> obj-y += fttsc010.o
>>> obj-y += ftsdc010.o
>>> +obj-y += ftspi020.o
>>> diff --git a/hw/arm/faraday_a369.c b/hw/arm/faraday_a369.c
>>> index 4ad48f5..132ee2f 100644
>>> --- a/hw/arm/faraday_a369.c
>>> +++ b/hw/arm/faraday_a369.c
>>> @@ -203,6 +203,18 @@ a369_device_init(A369State *s)
>>> req = qdev_get_gpio_in(s->hdma[0], 13);
>>> qdev_connect_gpio_out(s->hdma[0], 13, ack);
>>> qdev_connect_gpio_out(ds, 0, req);
>>> +
>>> + /* ftspi020: as an external AHB device */
>>> + ds = sysbus_create_simple("ftspi020", 0xC0000000, pic[13]);
>>> + spi = (SSIBus *)qdev_get_child_bus(ds, "spi");
>>> + nr_flash = 1;
>>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_flash; i++) {
>>> + fl = ssi_create_slave_no_init(spi, "m25p80");
>>> + qdev_prop_set_string(fl, "partname", "w25q64");
>>> + qdev_init_nofail(fl);
>>> + cs_line = qdev_get_gpio_in(fl, 0);
>>> + sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(ds), i + 1, cs_line);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void
>>> diff --git a/hw/arm/ftspi020.c b/hw/arm/ftspi020.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..dab2f6f
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/hw/arm/ftspi020.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * Faraday FTSPI020 Flash Controller
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2012 Faraday Technology
>>> + * Written by Dante Su <address@hidden>
>>> + *
>>> + * This code is licensed under GNU GPL v2+.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <hw/hw.h>
>>> +#include <sysemu/sysemu.h>
>>> +#include <hw/sysbus.h>
>>> +#include <hw/ssi.h>
>>> +
>>> +#include "ftspi020.h"
>>> +
>>> +#define TYPE_FTSPI020 "ftspi020"
>>> +
>>> +typedef struct Ftspi020State {
>>> + SysBusDevice busdev;
>>> + MemoryRegion iomem;
>>> + qemu_irq irq;
>>> +
>>> + /* DMA hardware handshake */
>>> + qemu_irq req;
>>> +
>>> + SSIBus *spi;
>>> + uint8_t num_cs;
>>
>> Constant. No need for it to be part of the device state, unless you
>> want to drive it from a property and let the machine model decide how
>> my cs lines you have?
>>
>
> Got you! I'll move these stuff to the top of faraday_a36x.c as defines.
>
>>> + qemu_irq *cs_lines;
>>> +
>>> + int wip; /* SPI Flash Status: Write In Progress BIT shift */
>>> + uint32_t datacnt;
>>> +
>>> + /* HW register caches */
>>> + uint32_t cmd[4];
>>> + uint32_t ctrl;
>>> + uint32_t timing;
>>> + uint32_t icr;
>>> + uint32_t isr;
>>> + uint32_t rdsr;
>>> +} Ftspi020State;
>>> +
>>> +#define FTSPI020(obj) \
>>> + OBJECT_CHECK(Ftspi020State, obj, TYPE_FTSPI020)
>>> +
>>> +static void ftspi020_update_irq(Ftspi020State *s)
>>> +{
>>> + if (s->isr) {
>>> + qemu_set_irq(s->irq, 1);
>>> + } else {
>>> + qemu_set_irq(s->irq, 0);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void ftspi020_handle_ack(void *opaque, int line, int level)
>>> +{
>>> + Ftspi020State *s = FTSPI020(opaque);
>>> +
>>> + if (!(s->icr & 0x01)) {
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (level) {
>>> + qemu_set_irq(s->req, 0);
>>> + } else if (s->datacnt > 0) {
>>> + qemu_set_irq(s->req, 1);
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int ftspi020_do_command(Ftspi020State *s)
>>> +{
>>> + int cs = (s->cmd[3] >> 8) & 0x03;
>>> + int cmd = (s->cmd[3] >> 24) & 0xff;
>>> + int ilen = (s->cmd[1] >> 24) & 0x03;
>>> + int alen = (s->cmd[1] >> 0) & 0x07;
>>> + int dcyc = (s->cmd[1] >> 16) & 0xff;
>>> +
>>
>> bitops.h has helpers that can extract fields for you without all the
>>>> & stuff. Lots of magic numbers here as well, can you #define these
>> offsets with meaningful names?
>
> Got you! I'll add some BIT OFFSET and MACROs for these stuff.
>
>>
>>> + /* make sure the spi flash is de-activated */
>>> + qemu_set_irq(s->cs_lines[cs], 1);
>>> +
>>> + /* activate the spi flash */
>>> + qemu_set_irq(s->cs_lines[cs], 0);
>>> +
>>> + /* if it's a SPI flash READ_STATUS command */
>>> + if ((s->cmd[3] & 0x06) == 0x04) {
>>> + do {
>>> + ssi_transfer(s->spi, cmd);
>>> + s->rdsr = ssi_transfer(s->spi, 0x00);
>>> + if (s->cmd[3] & 0x08) {
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + } while (s->rdsr & (1 << s->wip));
>>> + } else {
>>> + /* otherwise */
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + ilen = MIN(ilen, 2);
>>> + alen = MIN(alen, 4);
>>> +
>>> + /* command cycles */
>>> + for (i = 0; i < ilen; ++i) {
>>> + ssi_transfer(s->spi, cmd);
>>> + }
>>> + /* address cycles */
>>> + for (i = alen - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
>>> + ssi_transfer(s->spi, (s->cmd[0] >> (8 * i)) & 0xff);
>>> + }
>>> + /* dummy cycles */
>>> + for (i = 0; i < (dcyc >> 3); ++i) {
>>> + ssi_transfer(s->spi, 0x00);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (s->datacnt <= 0) {
>>
>> == as this is unsigned.
>
> Got you!
>
On second thoughts, just use
if (!s->datacnt) {
dont need ==. This is fairly standard for testing a down-to-0 counter.
>>
>>> + qemu_set_irq(s->cs_lines[cs], 1);
>>> + } else if (s->icr & 0x01) {
>>> + qemu_set_irq(s->req, 1);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (s->cmd[3] & 0x01) {
>>> + s->isr |= 0x01;
>>> + }
>>> + ftspi020_update_irq(s);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void ftspi020_chip_reset(Ftspi020State *s)
>>> +{
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + s->datacnt = 0;
>>> + for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
>>> + s->cmd[i] = 0;
>>> + }
>>> + s->wip = 0;
>>> + s->ctrl = 0;
>>> + s->timing = 0;
>>> + s->icr = 0;
>>> + s->isr = 0;
>>> + s->rdsr = 0;
>>> +
>>> + qemu_set_irq(s->irq, 0);
>>
>> Do the cs lines need resetting here?
>>
>
> Absolutely
>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static uint64_t ftspi020_mem_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
>>> +{
>>> + Ftspi020State *s = FTSPI020(opaque);
>>> + uint64_t ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> + switch (addr) {
>>> + case REG_DATA:
>>> + if (!(s->cmd[3] & 0x02)) {
>>> + if (s->datacnt > 0) {
>>> + ret |= (uint32_t)(ssi_transfer(s->spi, 0x00) & 0xff) << 0;
>>> + ret |= (uint32_t)(ssi_transfer(s->spi, 0x00) & 0xff) << 8;
>>> + ret |= (uint32_t)(ssi_transfer(s->spi, 0x00) & 0xff) << 16;
>>> + ret |= (uint32_t)(ssi_transfer(s->spi, 0x00) & 0xff) << 24;
>>
>> loopable:
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
>> ret = deposit32(ret, i * 8, 8, (uint32_t)(ssi_transfer(s->spi,
>> 0x00) & 0xff));
>> }
>>
>
> Got you
>
>>> + s->datacnt = (s->datacnt < 4) ? 0 : (s->datacnt - 4);
>>> + }
>>> + if (s->datacnt == 0) {
>>> + uint8_t cs = (s->cmd[3] >> 8) & 0x03;
>>> + qemu_set_irq(s->cs_lines[cs], 1);
>>> + if (s->cmd[3] & 0x01) {
>>> + s->isr |= 0x01;
>>> + }
>>> + ftspi020_update_irq(s);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> + case REG_RDST:
>>> + return s->rdsr;
>>> + case REG_CMD0:
>>
>> the case .. syntax would allow you to collapse these 4 into 1:
>>
>> case REG_CMD0 .. REG_CMD3:
>> return s->cmd[(addr - REG_CMD0) / 4]
>>
>
> Got you
>
>>> + return s->cmd[0];
>>> + case REG_CMD1:
>>> + return s->cmd[1];
>>> + case REG_CMD2:
>>> + return s->cmd[2];
>>> + case REG_CMD3:
>>> + return s->cmd[3];
>>> + case REG_STR:
>>> + /* In QEMU, the data fifo is always ready for read/write */
>>> + return 0x00000003;
>>> + case REG_ISR:
>>> + return s->isr;
>>> + case REG_ICR:
>>> + return s->icr;
>>> + case REG_CTRL:
>>> + return s->ctrl;
>>> + case REG_ACT:
>>> + return s->timing;
>>> + case REG_REV:
>>> + return 0x00010001;
>>> + case REG_FEA:
>>> + return 0x02022020;
>>
>> Few magic numbers here
>>
>
> case REG_REV:
> return 0x00010001; /* revision 1.0.1 */
ACK
> case REG_FEA:
> return 0x02022020; /* Clock Mode=SYNC, cmd queue = 4, tx/rx fifo=32 */
>
You could these as three pieces as macros and | them together. I wont
block on it however.
> However in QEMU, there is no I/O delay to access the underlying SPI flash,
> so the clock, and fifo depth information are totally useless.
>
>>> + default:
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void ftspi020_mem_write(void *opaque,
>>> + hwaddr addr,
>>> + uint64_t val,
>>> + unsigned size)
>>> +{
>>> + Ftspi020State *s = FTSPI020(opaque);
>>> +
>>> + switch (addr) {
>>> + case REG_DATA:
>>> + if (s->cmd[3] & 0x02) {
>>> + if (s->datacnt > 0) {
>>> + ssi_transfer(s->spi, (uint8_t)((val >> 0) & 0xff));
>>> + ssi_transfer(s->spi, (uint8_t)((val >> 8) & 0xff));
>>> + ssi_transfer(s->spi, (uint8_t)((val >> 16) & 0xff));
>>> + ssi_transfer(s->spi, (uint8_t)((val >> 24) & 0xff));
>>> + s->datacnt = (s->datacnt < 4) ? 0 : (s->datacnt - 4);
>>> + }
>>> + if (s->datacnt == 0) {
>>> + uint8_t cs = (s->cmd[3] >> 8) & 0x03;
>>> + qemu_set_irq(s->cs_lines[cs], 1);
>>> + if (s->cmd[3] & 0x01) {
>>> + s->isr |= 0x01;
>>> + }
>>> + ftspi020_update_irq(s);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + break;
>>> + case REG_CMD0:
>>> + s->cmd[0] = (uint32_t)val;
>>> + break;
>>> + case REG_CMD1:
>>> + s->cmd[1] = (uint32_t)val;
>>> + break;
>>> + case REG_CMD2:
>>> + s->datacnt = s->cmd[2] = (uint32_t)val;
>>> + break;
>>> + case REG_CMD3:
>>> + s->cmd[3] = (uint32_t)val;
>>> + ftspi020_do_command(s);
>>> + break;
>>> + case REG_ISR:
>>> + s->isr &= ~((uint32_t)val);
>>> + ftspi020_update_irq(s);
>>> + break;
>>> + case REG_ICR:
>>> + s->icr = (uint32_t)val;
>>> + break;
>>> + case REG_CTRL:
>>> + if (val & 0x100) {
>>> + ftspi020_chip_reset(s);
>>> + }
>>> + s->ctrl = (uint32_t)val & 0x70013;
>>> + s->wip = ((uint32_t)val >> 16) & 0x07;
>>> + break;
>>> + case REG_ACT:
>>> + s->timing = (uint32_t)val;
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const MemoryRegionOps ftspi020_ops = {
>>> + .read = ftspi020_mem_read,
>>> + .write = ftspi020_mem_write,
>>> + .endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void ftspi020_reset(DeviceState *ds)
>>> +{
>>> + SysBusDevice *busdev = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(ds);
>>> + Ftspi020State *s = FTSPI020(FROM_SYSBUS(Ftspi020State, busdev));
>>> +
>>> + ftspi020_chip_reset(s);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int ftspi020_init(SysBusDevice *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + Ftspi020State *s = FTSPI020(FROM_SYSBUS(Ftspi020State, dev));
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem,
>>> + &ftspi020_ops,
>>> + s,
>>> + TYPE_FTSPI020,
>>> + 0x1000);
>>> + sysbus_init_mmio(dev, &s->iomem);
>>> + sysbus_init_irq(dev, &s->irq);
>>> +
>>> + s->spi = ssi_create_bus(&dev->qdev, "spi");
>>> + s->num_cs = 4;
>>> + s->cs_lines = g_new(qemu_irq, s->num_cs);
>>> + ssi_auto_connect_slaves(DEVICE(s), s->cs_lines, s->spi);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < s->num_cs; ++i) {
>>> + sysbus_init_irq(dev, &s->cs_lines[i]);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + qdev_init_gpio_in(&s->busdev.qdev, ftspi020_handle_ack, 1);
>>> + qdev_init_gpio_out(&s->busdev.qdev, &s->req, 1);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_ftspi020 = {
>>> + .name = TYPE_FTSPI020,
>>> + .version_id = 1,
>>> + .minimum_version_id = 1,
>>> + .minimum_version_id_old = 1,
>>> + .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
>>> + VMSTATE_UINT32_ARRAY(cmd, Ftspi020State, 4),
>>> + VMSTATE_UINT32(ctrl, Ftspi020State),
>>> + VMSTATE_UINT32(timing, Ftspi020State),
>>> + VMSTATE_UINT32(icr, Ftspi020State),
>>> + VMSTATE_UINT32(isr, Ftspi020State),
>>> + VMSTATE_UINT32(rdsr, Ftspi020State),
>>
>> datacnt is missing. I think you need to save it as it is device state
>> that would need to be preserved if you machine got migrated in the
>> middle of a transaction.
>>
>
> Got you
>
>>> + VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST(),
>>> + }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void ftspi020_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> + SysBusDeviceClass *k = SYS_BUS_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>>> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>>> +
>>> + k->init = ftspi020_init;
>>> + dc->vmsd = &vmstate_ftspi020;
>>> + dc->reset = ftspi020_reset;
>>> + dc->no_user = 1;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const TypeInfo ftspi020_info = {
>>> + .name = TYPE_FTSPI020,
>>> + .parent = TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE,
>>> + .instance_size = sizeof(Ftspi020State),
>>> + .class_init = ftspi020_class_init,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void ftspi020_register_types(void)
>>> +{
>>> + type_register_static(&ftspi020_info);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +type_init(ftspi020_register_types)
>>> diff --git a/hw/arm/ftspi020.h b/hw/arm/ftspi020.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..a8a0930
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/hw/arm/ftspi020.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * Faraday FTSPI020 Flash Controller
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2012 Faraday Technology
>>> + * Written by Dante Su <address@hidden>
>>> + *
>>> + * This code is licensed under GNU GPL v2+.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef HW_ARM_FTSPI020_H
>>> +#define HW_ARM_FTSPI020_H
>>> +
>>
>> This device is not exporting any extensible APIs there is no need for
>> a header specific to this device.
>>
>
> Got you, but does this applied to ftrtc011 ?
> I remember someone had made a request to me to create header files
> for registers. Or maybe it's just a mis-understanding.
>
Can you do me a fav and link me the discussion?
>>> +/******************************************************************************
>>> + * FTSPI020 registers
>>> +
>>> *****************************************************************************/
>>> +#define REG_CMD0 0x00 /* Flash address */
>>> +#define REG_CMD1 0x04
>>> +#define REG_CMD2 0x08
>>> +#define REG_CMD3 0x0c
>>> +#define REG_CTRL 0x10 /* Control Register */
>>> +#define REG_ACT 0x14 /* AC Timing Register */
>>> +#define REG_STR 0x18 /* Status Register */
>>> +#define REG_ICR 0x20 /* Interrupt Control Register */
>>> +#define REG_ISR 0x24 /* Interrupt Status Register */
>>> +#define REG_RDST 0x28 /* Read Status Register */
>>> +#define REG_REV 0x50 /* Revision Register */
>>> +#define REG_FEA 0x54 /* Feature Register */
>>> +#define REG_DATA 0x100 /* Data Register */
>>> +
>>
>> These can just live in the C file - they are private to the implementation.
>>
>
> Same above
>
>>> +/******************************************************************************
>>> + * Common SPI flash opcodes (Not FTSPI020 specific)
>>> +
>>> *****************************************************************************/
>>> +#define OPCODE_WREN 0x06 /* Write enable */
>>> +#define OPCODE_WRSR 0x01 /* Write status register 1 byte */
>>> +#define OPCODE_RDSR 0x05 /* Read status register */
>>> +#define OPCODE_NORM_READ 0x03 /* Read data bytes (low frequency) */
>>> +#define OPCODE_NORM_READ4 0x13 /* Read data bytes (4 bytes address) */
>>> +#define OPCODE_FAST_READ 0x0b /* Read data bytes (high frequency) */
>>> +#define OPCODE_FAST_READ4 0x0c /* Read data bytes (4 bytes address) */
>>> +#define OPCODE_PP 0x02 /* Page program (up to 256 bytes) */
>>> +#define OPCODE_PP4 0x12 /* Page program (4 bytes address) */
>>> +#define OPCODE_SE 0xd8 /* Sector erase (usually 64KiB) */
>>> +#define OPCODE_SE4 0xdc /* Sector erase (4 bytes address) */
>>> +#define OPCODE_RDID 0x9f /* Read JEDEC ID */
>>> +
>>
>> This is repetition of M25P80s command opcodes. If anything, we should
>> factor these out into m25p80.h (doesnt exist yet) as this is the
>> second device model (apart from m25p80 itself) to need these. The
>> other one is xilinx_spips.c. However i notice almost all of these are
>> unused by your device model. Apart from the little bit of logic around
>> RDSR, is there any flash command-specific functionality in this
>> device? AFAICT it just accepts command code, address, num dummies and
>> payload size and the details of what those commands mean is abstracted
>> away from this hardware, making this table mostly redundant. If you
>> have future work that will need this that's another matter however.
>>
>
> You're absolutely right, the SPI flash commands has been abstracted.
> None of the OPCODE is used i the model.
>
Then i think we delete the table in its entirety. The RDSR part can be
local to the C file (if needed see comment below).
> About the RDSR, it requires the driver to set corresponding BIT in s->cmd[3]
> before issuing a RDSR(0x05) to underlying SPI flash device.
>
Currently your hardware (as I read it) is snooping the requested
command to changing behavior based on if (cmd = RDSR). From what you
say here however, isnt this alternate behaviour triggered by a
s->cmd[3] bit field? I.e. can the correct bevhaviour of this device be
captured by your device watching s->cmd[3] rather than checking the
request command for the RDSR opcode?
If this is the case then just delete the whole table and drive your
logic off your command registers.
> These bits are
>
> BIT3 - 0: polling status by hardware, driver should polling the status
> register of FTSPI020
> to check when the flash is back to idle state. (RDSR is
> sent only once)
> 1: polling status by hardware, driver would have to keep
> sending RDSR and
> read the status back to check if the flash is now idle.
>
> BIT2 - 0: this command is not a RDSR (READ_STATUS)
> 1: this command is a RDSR (READ_STATUS)
>
> BTW, tomorrow is the beginning of my Chinese New Year holidays, so
> please forgive me
> that I won't be able to make any response to the comments for 10 days.
>
No rush. Enjoy your holidays.
Regards,
Peter
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 15/20] arm: add Faraday FTMAC110 10/100Mbps ethernet support, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/20] arm: add Faraday FTDMAC020 AHB DMA support, Kuo-Jung Su, 2013/02/06
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 19/20] arm: add Faraday FTSDC010 MMC/SD controller support, Kuo-Jung Su, 2013/02/06
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support, Kuo-Jung Su, 2013/02/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support, Peter Crosthwaite, 2013/02/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support, Kuo-Jung Su, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support,
Peter Crosthwaite <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support, Kuo-Jung Su, 2013/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support, Andreas Färber, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support, Peter Maydell, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support, Andreas Färber, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support, Paolo Bonzini, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support, Peter Maydell, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support, Peter Crosthwaite, 2013/02/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 20/20] arm: add Faraday FTSPI020 SPI flash controller support, Kuo-Jung Su, 2013/02/18