[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Handle arches with llseek instead o
From: |
Jia Liu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Handle arches with llseek instead of _llseek |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:14:55 +0800 |
Hi James,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:51 AM, James Hogan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Recently merged kernel ports (such as OpenRISC and Meta) have an llseek
> system call instead of _llseek. This is handled for the host
> architecture by defining __NR__llseek as __NR_llseek, but not for the
> target architecture.
Thank you, James.
I don't have a Linux test environment for I'm a OS X user,
may you please make a test, please?
>
> Handle it in the same way for these architectures, defining
> TARGET_NR__llseek as TARGET_NR_llseek.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Hogan <address@hidden>
> Cc: Riku Voipio <address@hidden>
> Cc: Jia Liu <address@hidden>
> ---
> linux-user/syscall.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
> index 2eac6d5..8dbe39b 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
> @@ -198,6 +198,11 @@ static type name (type1 arg1,type2 arg2,type3 arg3,type4
> arg4,type5 arg5, \
> #define __NR__llseek __NR_lseek
> #endif
>
> +/* Newer kernel ports have llseek() instead of _llseek() */
> +#if defined(TARGET_NR_llseek) && !defined(TARGET_NR__llseek)
> +#define TARGET_NR__llseek TARGET_NR_llseek
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef __NR_gettid
> _syscall0(int, gettid)
> #else
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>
Regards,
Jia