[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: handle BUSY condition
From: |
Peter Lieven |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: handle BUSY condition |
Date: |
Thu, 29 May 2014 22:25:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 |
Am 29.05.2014 21:17, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 29/05/2014 20:41, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>> static inline unsigned geo_rand_range(double m, double n) {
>> return exp((log(m) + (double)rand() /
>> (RAND_MAX / (log(n) - log(m) + log(1)) + log(1))));
>> }
>
> Yes, exactly (except that log(1) is zero, and was only needed in your case
> because you were using integers).
Regarding aio_timer_new vs. aio_timer_init. Shall we really have the complete
QEMU_TIMER struct in each
iTask? We need this retry_timer only in the really rare case of a BUSY.
Peter
>
> Paolo
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: handle BUSY condition, Peter Lieven, 2014/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: handle BUSY condition, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: handle BUSY condition, Peter Lieven, 2014/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: handle BUSY condition, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: handle BUSY condition, Peter Lieven, 2014/05/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: handle BUSY condition,
Peter Lieven <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: handle BUSY condition, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/05/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: handle BUSY condition, Peter Lieven, 2014/05/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/iscsi: handle BUSY condition, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/05/30