[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: Adjust the place of calling mlockall to spe
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: Adjust the place of calling mlockall to speedup VM's startup |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:30:26 +0300 |
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 03:57:47PM +0800, zhanghailiang wrote:
> If we configure mlock=on and memory policy=bind at the same time,
> It will consume lots of time for system to treat with memory,
> especially when call mbind after mlockall.
>
> Adjust the place of calling mlockall, calling mbind before mlockall
> can remarkably reduce the time of VM's startup.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <address@hidden>
The idea makes absolute sense to me:
bind after lock will force data copy of
all pages. bind before lock gives us an
indication where to put data on fault in.
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> Actually, for mbind and mlockall, i have made a test about the time consuming
> for the different call sequence.
>
> The results is shown below. It is obviously that mlockall called before mbind
> is
> more time-consuming.
>
> Besides, this patch is OK with memory hotplug.
>
> TEST CODE:
> if (mbind_first) {
> printf("mbind --> mlockall\n");
> mbind(ptr, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node0mask, 2,
> MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
> mbind(ptr + ram_size/2, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node1mask, 2,
> MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
> mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE);
> } else {
> printf("mlockall --> mbind\n");
> mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE);
> mbind(ptr, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node0mask, 2 ,
> MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
> mbind(ptr + ram_size/2, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node1mask, 2,
> MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
> }
>
> RESULT 1:
> #time /home/test_mbind 10240 0
> memroy size 10737418240
> mlockall --> mbind
>
> real 0m11.886s
> user 0m0.004s
> sys 0m11.865s
> #time /home/test_mbind 10240 1
> memroy size 10737418240
> mbind --> mlockall
>
> real 0m5.334s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m5.324s
>
> RESULT 2:
> #time /home/test_mbind 4096 0
> memroy size 4294967296
> mlockall --> mbind
>
> real 0m5.503s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m5.492s
> #time /home/test_mbind 4096 1
> memroy size 4294967296
> mbind --> mlockall
>
> real 0m2.139s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m2.132s
>
> Best Regards,
> zhanghailiang
> ---
> vl.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> index dc792fe..adf4770 100644
> --- a/vl.c
> +++ b/vl.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ const char* keyboard_layout = NULL;
> ram_addr_t ram_size;
> const char *mem_path = NULL;
> int mem_prealloc = 0; /* force preallocation of physical target memory */
> +int enable_mlock = false;
> int nb_nics;
> NICInfo nd_table[MAX_NICS];
> int autostart;
> @@ -1421,12 +1422,8 @@ static void smp_parse(QemuOpts *opts)
>
> }
>
> -static void configure_realtime(QemuOpts *opts)
> +static void realtime_init(void)
> {
> - bool enable_mlock;
> -
> - enable_mlock = qemu_opt_get_bool(opts, "mlock", true);
> -
> if (enable_mlock) {
> if (os_mlock() < 0) {
> fprintf(stderr, "qemu: locking memory failed\n");
> @@ -3973,7 +3970,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
> if (!opts) {
> exit(1);
> }
> - configure_realtime(opts);
> + enable_mlock = qemu_opt_get_bool(opts, "mlock", true);
> break;
> case QEMU_OPTION_msg:
> opts = qemu_opts_parse(qemu_find_opts("msg"), optarg, 0);
> @@ -4441,6 +4438,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
>
> machine_class->init(current_machine);
>
> + realtime_init();
> +
> audio_init();
>
> cpu_synchronize_all_post_init();
> --
> 1.7.12.4
>