[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio: Fix wrong type cast from pointer to lon
From: |
Fam Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio: Fix wrong type cast from pointer to long |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:12:42 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Wed, 09/24 05:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 September 2014 01:46, Fam Zheng <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Wed, 09/24 07:20, Stefan Weil wrote:
> >> Compiler warning (w32, w64):
> >>
> >> include/hw/virtio/virtio_ring.h:142:26: warning:
> >> cast from pointer to integer of different size [-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
> >>
> >> When sizeof(long) < sizeof(void *), this is not only a warning but a
> >> real program error.
> >>
> >> Add also missing blanks in the same statement.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Peter, could you please apply this bug fix directly without pull request?
>
> Applied to master, thanks.
>
> >> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio_ring.h
> >> b/include/hw/virtio/virtio_ring.h
> >> index 8f58bc9..0b42e6e 100644
> >> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio_ring.h
> >> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio_ring.h
> >> @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ static inline void vring_init(struct vring *vr,
> >> unsigned int num, void *p,
> >> vr->num = num;
> >> vr->desc = p;
> >> vr->avail = p + num*sizeof(struct vring_desc);
> >> - vr->used = (void *)(((unsigned long)&vr->avail->ring[num] +
> >> sizeof(uint16_t)
> >> - + align-1) & ~(align - 1));
> >> + vr->used = (void *)(((uintptr_t)&vr->avail->ring[num] +
> >> sizeof(uint16_t)
> >> + + align - 1) & ~(align - 1));
> >> }
> >>
> >> static inline unsigned vring_size(unsigned int num, unsigned long align)
> >> --
> >> 1.7.10.4
> >>
> >
> > That was from copy&paste /usr/include/linux/virtio_ring.h. The patch looks
> > good
> > to me, should linux also need this fix?
>
> In Linux the "long" type is always the same as the size of a pointer;
> it's only Windows that went for the LLP64 model rather than LP64.
>
Okay, Thanks for explaining!
Fam