[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Recursive op blockers
From: |
Benoît Canet |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] Recursive op blockers |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2014 16:08:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:00:50PM +0200, Benoît Canet wrote:
> in v2:
> Added a base parameters [Kevin]
> Remove multiple blockers [Kevin]
>
> Addressed Kevin's comments except BLOCK_OP_TYPE_MIRROR_REPLACE
> relaxing
> and "You need to unblock all of the BDSes that are going to be
> removed.
> Aren't you unblocking more than that here?".
>
>
> pass ./check -qcow2
>
> Benoît Canet (2):
> block: Rename BLOCK_OP_TYPE_REPLACE to BLOCK_OP_TYPE_MIRROR_REPLACE
> block: Make op blockers recursive
>
> block-migration.c | 4 +-
> block.c | 123
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> block/blkverify.c | 21 ++++++++
> block/commit.c | 2 +
> block/mirror.c | 26 +++++++---
> block/quorum.c | 29 +++++++++++
> block/stream.c | 2 +
> block/vmdk.c | 32 ++++++++++++
> blockjob.c | 6 +--
> include/block/block.h | 14 ++++--
> include/block/block_int.h | 10 ++++
> 11 files changed, 242 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.1.0
>
Hello people,
Gentle ping,
I would really like these patches to get rev-by and merged for the next release
since they actually fix QEMU.
Under the new rule of code review I choose Markus or Jeff to do the initial
revision.
I could nag Kevin into reviewing it but it's not the process anymore.
Best regards
Benoît