[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:13:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
On 10/29/2014 05:37 PM, Liviu Ionescu wrote:
>> > I mean that writes to ROM or flash via gdb should modify the ROM
>> > directly, unlike writes by the CPU.
> you may be right, but I don't see the point related to semihosting, in this
> case the BRKs are permanent in flash.
It's not, it's just something else you brought up. :)
Paolo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Peter Maydell, 2014/10/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Christopher Covington, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Andreas Färber, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Peter Maydell, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Peter Maydell, 2014/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Better Cortex-M support?, Liviu Ionescu, 2014/10/29