[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Start moving migration code into a migratio
|
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Start moving migration code into a migration directory |
|
Date: |
Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:53:54 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
* Gary Hook (address@hidden) wrote:
>
>
> On 10/30/14, 7:26 AM, "Amit Shah" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >On (Thu) 16 Oct 2014 [08:53:52], Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> >> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> The migration code now occupies a fair chunk of the top level .c
> >> files, it seems time to give it it's own directory.
> >
> >s/it's/its
>
> 6 out of 87 .c files, and approximately 370 blocks out of 2840 (based on
> du output). 13% is a "fair chunk"?
I'm not sure how you got 6;
migration.c
migration-exec.c
migration-fd.c
migration-rdma.c
migration-tcp.c
migration-unix.c
qemu-file-buf.c
qemu-file.c
qemu-file-stdio.c
qemu-file-unix.c
vmstate.c
xbzrle.c
so that's 12, and there are another 3 in the commit message saying they could
do with being moved. That would be 15 files, or 17% - and so yes, I do call
that
a fair chunk.
> But tidy organization is a good thing while needless renaming is not. The
> only goal that the suggested renames would appear to accomplish is
> additional obfuscation. How about just moving them into a subdirectory and
> leave their names alone?
Which is what I did; however I have sympathy with those that think that in a
directory called 'migration' starting a bunch of the files with 'migration-' is
excessive.
Dave
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Start moving migration code into a migration directory,
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <=