[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:03:09 +0200 |
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 04:00:38PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 06/17/15 15:57, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:45:05PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> SeaBIOS expects OpenFirmware device paths in the "bootorder" fw_cfg file
> >> to follow the pattern
> >>
> >> /address@hidden/address@hidden/...
> >
> > It's kind of crazy, isn't it?
>
> It's... idiosyncratic.
Yes - hoping for an answer from Kevin.
> > /address@hidden/address@hidden would make some sense: access rootN through
> > cf8.
> >
> > But if bios needs to keep this for compatibility, maybe
> > we have too, to. Kevin?
>
> The only reason I'm doing this is because SeaBIOS expects precisely this
> OFW devpath fragment.
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
>
> >
> >>
> >> for devices that live behind an extra root bus. The extra root bus in
> >> question is the N'th among the extra root bridges. (In other words, N
> >> gives the position of the affected extra root bus relative to the other
> >> extra root buses, in bus_nr order.) N starts at 1, and is formatted in
> >> hex.
> >>
> >> The "address@hidden" node text is hardcoded in SeaBIOS (see the macro
> >> FW_PCI_DOMAIN).
> >>
> >> Cc: Kevin O'Connor <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> >> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <address@hidden>
> >> Tested-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> >> Reviewed-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
> >
> > This makes this a PC-specific device, which is pretty ugly.
> > You need to hardcode /address@hidden here, but why not get
> > /address@hidden from the real root?
> >
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Notes:
> >> v6:
> >> - no changes
> >>
> >> v5:
> >> - constify parameter and local variables of
> >> pxb_host_ofw_unit_address(),
> >> in accord with the previous patch
> >>
> >> v4:
> >> - new in v4
> >>
> >> hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c | 39
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> >> b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> >> index 4398d98..37574ec 100644
> >> --- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> >> +++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> >> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ typedef struct PXBDev {
> >> uint16_t numa_node;
> >> } PXBDev;
> >>
> >> +static GList *pxb_dev_list;
> >> +
> >> #define TYPE_PXB_HOST "pxb-host"
> >>
> >> static int pxb_bus_num(PCIBus *bus)
> >> @@ -88,12 +90,29 @@ static const char *pxb_host_root_bus_path(PCIHostState
> >> *host_bridge,
> >> return bus->bus_path;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static char *pxb_host_ofw_unit_address(const SysBusDevice *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + const PCIHostState *host = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(dev);
> >> + const PCIBus *bus;
> >> + const PXBDev *pxb;
> >> + int position;
> >> +
> >> + bus = host->bus;
> >> + pxb = PXB_DEV(bus->parent_dev);
> >> + position = g_list_index(pxb_dev_list, pxb);
> >> + assert(position >= 0);
> >> +
> >> + return g_strdup_printf("%x/address@hidden", position + 1);
> >
> > Please document that this reverse order is to match
> > existing bios behaviour.
> >
> >
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static void pxb_host_class_init(ObjectClass *class, void *data)
> >> {
> >> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(class);
> >> + SysBusDeviceClass *sbc = SYS_BUS_DEVICE_CLASS(class);
> >> PCIHostBridgeClass *hc = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_CLASS(class);
> >>
> >> - dc->fw_name = "pci";
> >> + dc->fw_name = "pci-root";
> >> + sbc->explicit_ofw_unit_address = pxb_host_ofw_unit_address;
> >> hc->root_bus_path = pxb_host_root_bus_path;
> >> }
> >>
> >> @@ -148,6 +167,15 @@ static int pxb_map_irq_fn(PCIDevice *pci_dev, int pin)
> >> return pin - PCI_SLOT(pxb->devfn);
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static gint pxb_compare(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
> >> +{
> >> + const PXBDev *pxb_a = a, *pxb_b = b;
> >> +
> >> + return pxb_a->bus_nr < pxb_b->bus_nr ? -1 :
> >> + pxb_a->bus_nr > pxb_b->bus_nr ? 1 :
> >> + 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static int pxb_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
> >> {
> >> PXBDev *pxb = PXB_DEV(dev);
> >> @@ -191,9 +219,17 @@ static int pxb_dev_initfn(PCIDevice *dev)
> >> PCI_STATUS_66MHZ | PCI_STATUS_FAST_BACK);
> >> pci_config_set_class(dev->config, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST);
> >>
> >> + pxb_dev_list = g_list_insert_sorted(pxb_dev_list, pxb, pxb_compare);
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void pxb_dev_exitfn(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
> >> +{
> >> + PXBDev *pxb = PXB_DEV(pci_dev);
> >> +
> >> + pxb_dev_list = g_list_remove(pxb_dev_list, pxb);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static Property pxb_dev_properties[] = {
> >> /* Note: 0 is not a legal a PXB bus number. */
> >> DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("bus_nr", PXBDev, bus_nr, 0),
> >> @@ -207,6 +243,7 @@ static void pxb_dev_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
> >> void *data)
> >> PCIDeviceClass *k = PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> >>
> >> k->init = pxb_dev_initfn;
> >> + k->exit = pxb_dev_exitfn;
> >> k->vendor_id = PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT;
> >> k->device_id = PCI_DEVICE_ID_REDHAT_PXB;
> >> k->class_id = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST;
> >> --
> >> 1.8.3.1
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 3/7] hw/pci-bridge: introduce "hotplug" property, (continued)
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 6/7] hw/core: explicit OFW unit address callback for SysBusDeviceClass, Laszlo Ersek, 2015/06/17
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 4/7] hw/pci-bridge: disable hotplug in PXB, Laszlo Ersek, 2015/06/17
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Laszlo Ersek, 2015/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2015/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Kevin O'Connor, 2015/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Laszlo Ersek, 2015/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2015/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Laszlo Ersek, 2015/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2015/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Laszlo Ersek, 2015/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Kevin O'Connor, 2015/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2015/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Laszlo Ersek, 2015/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 7/7] hw/pci-bridge: format SeaBIOS-compliant OFW device node for PXB, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2015/06/17