[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio_ring: use smp_store_mb
From: |
Peter Zijlstra |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio_ring: use smp_store_mb |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Dec 2015 15:02:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) |
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 03:26:29PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Note that virtio_mb() is weirdly inconsistent with virtio_[rw]mb() in
> > that they use dma_* ops for weak_barriers, while virtio_mb() uses
> > smp_mb().
>
> It's a hack really. I think I'll clean it up a bit to
> make it more consistent.
>
> To simplify things, you may consider things before
> the optimization brought in by
> commit 9e1a27ea42691429e31f158cce6fc61bc79bb2e9
> Author: Alexander Duyck <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon Apr 13 21:03:49 2015 +0930
>
> virtio_ring: Update weak barriers to use dma_wmb/rmb
That commit doesn't make any sense. dma_*mb() explicitly does _NOT_
cover the smp_*mb() part.
Again, look at the ARM definitions, the smp_*mb() primitives use the
inner coherence stuff, while the dma_*mb() primitives use the outer
coherent stuff.
the *mb() primitives cover both.