[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] gtk: use setlocale() for LC_MESSAGES only
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] gtk: use setlocale() for LC_MESSAGES only |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Dec 2015 10:49:27 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
On 12/18/2015 12:55 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Alberto Garcia <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>>>> We do however have translations for a few simple strings for the GTK+
>>>>> menu items, so in order to run QEMU using the C locale, and yet have a
>>>>> translated UI let's use setlocale() for LC_MESSAGES only.
>>>>>
>>>> Not sure why I noticed it only now and if it's related to any recent
>>>> package upgrade on my side (using RHEL 7), but I noticed that
>>>> non-ASCII characters in the GTK UI strings are broken for me and git
>>>> bisect pointed to this commit.
>>>
>>> I guess we need to set LC_CTYPE too.
>>
>> That affects functions in ctype.h (isalpha(), islower(), isupper(), ...)
>> I guess that's safe?
Gnulib introduces functions named c_isalpha(), c_islower(), and so
forth, which behave identically regardless of the current locale,
precisely because locale-dependent definitions on which byte sequences
form a valid character can cause undesirable behavior. I don't know if
glib does the same, but it does indeed have the potential to affect us,
in at least util/id.c:id_wellformed(). It would be weird to let the
user's choice of locale determine which ids they can create.
>
> If we're guessing, then I guess it isn't. But we shouldn't be guessing.
>
> "LC_CTYPE affects the behavior of the character handling functions and
> the multibyte and wide character functions."
>
> I doubt there's much use for the latter in QEMU itself, but in
> libraries, all bets are off. I guess this is what actually screws up
> GTK.
>
> We do use the former. LC_CTYPE set to some sufficiently funky locale is
> bound to upset these uses.
>
> In short: nope, we can't just set LC_CTYPE, at least not without further
> analysis.
In fact, if LC_CTYPE and LC_COLLATE are incompatible, then strcoll() has
undefined behavior. GNU coreutils warns:
Unless otherwise specified, all comparisons use the character
collating sequence specified by the ‘LC_COLLATE’ locale.(1)
[...]
(1) If you use a non-POSIX locale (e.g., by setting ‘LC_ALL’ to
‘en_US’), then ‘sort’ may produce output that is sorted differently than
you’re accustomed to. In that case, set the ‘LC_ALL’ environment
variable to ‘C’. Note that setting only ‘LC_COLLATE’ has two problems.
First, it is ineffective if ‘LC_ALL’ is also set. Second, it has
undefined behavior if ‘LC_CTYPE’ (or ‘LANG’, if ‘LC_CTYPE’ is unset) is
set to an incompatible value. For example, you get undefined behavior
if ‘LC_CTYPE’ is ‘ja_JP.PCK’ but ‘LC_COLLATE’ is ‘en_US.UTF-8’.
Off-hand, we are specifically NOT calling setlocale() for the categories
that we want to leave in the C locale, so we don't have to worry about
LC_ALL throwing us off. And I'm hard-pressed to think of an example
where LC_COLLATE=C while LC_CTYPE is a multibyte character will cause
unusual sorting artifacts (the one that coreutils is warning against is
when you have two incompatibly different multibyte character sets
involved, where our case is a multibyte character set for display but a
unibyte set for collation). But it is indeed a can of worms, that
requires special analysis.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature