[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/3] Better 'Force Unit Access' handling
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/3] Better 'Force Unit Access' handling |
Date: |
Wed, 11 May 2016 14:30:58 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 02:38:29PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.05.2016 um 00:39 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> > I noticed some inconsistencies in FUA handling while working
> > with NBD, then Kevin pointed out that my initial attempt wasn't
> > quite right for iscsi which also had problems, so this has
> > expanded into a series rather than a single patch.
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is qemu-stable material at this point.
> >
> > Depends on Kevin's block-next branch.
> >
> > Also available as a tag at this location:
> > git fetch git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git nbd-fua-v2
>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
>
> Stefan, if you're happy with the series, I can merge it into block-next.
>
> Kevin
Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/3] Better 'Force Unit Access' handling, Eric Blake, 2016/05/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 1/3] block: Make supported_write_flags a per-bds property, Eric Blake, 2016/05/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 2/3] block: Honor BDRV_REQ_FUA during write_zeroes, Eric Blake, 2016/05/03
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 3/3] nbd: Simplify client FUA handling, Eric Blake, 2016/05/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/3] Better 'Force Unit Access' handling, Kevin Wolf, 2016/05/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/3] Better 'Force Unit Access' handling,
Stefan Hajnoczi <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2 0/3] Better 'Force Unit Access' handling, Fam Zheng, 2016/05/10