Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL RESEND 12/19] vmxnet3: Convert ring values to uint32_t's

[Dr. David Alan Gilbert]

* Laurent Vivier (address@hidden) wrote:
> On 14/03/2017 12:38, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Laurent Vivier (address@hidden) wrote:
> >> On 14/03/2017 12:16, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> >>> * Laurent Vivier (address@hidden) wrote:
> >>>> On 06/03/2017 06:25, Jason Wang wrote:
> >>>>> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <address@hidden>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The index's in the Vmxnet3Ring were migrated as 32bit ints
> >>>>> yet are declared as size_t's.  They appear to be derived
> >>>>> from 32bit values loaded from guest memory, so actually
> >>>>> store them as that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden>
> >>>>> Acked-by: Dmitry Fleytman <address@hidden>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <address@hidden>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  hw/net/vmxnet3.c | 12 ++++++------
> >>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/hw/net/vmxnet3.c b/hw/net/vmxnet3.c
> >>>>> index e13a798..224c109 100644
> >>>>> --- a/hw/net/vmxnet3.c
> >>>>> +++ b/hw/net/vmxnet3.c
> >>>>> @@ -141,17 +141,17 @@ typedef struct VMXNET3Class {
> >>>>>  /* Cyclic ring abstraction */
> >>>>>  typedef struct {
> >>>>>      hwaddr pa;
> >>>>> -    size_t size;
> >>>>> -    size_t cell_size;
> >>>>> -    size_t next;
> >>>>> +    uint32_t size;
> >>>>> +    uint32_t cell_size;
> >>>>> +    uint32_t next;
> >>>>>      uint8_t gen;
> >>>>>  } Vmxnet3Ring;
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  static inline void vmxnet3_ring_init(PCIDevice *d,
> >>>>>                                      Vmxnet3Ring *ring,
> >>>>>                                       hwaddr pa,
> >>>>> -                                     size_t size,
> >>>>> -                                     size_t cell_size,
> >>>>> +                                     uint32_t size,
> >>>>> +                                     uint32_t cell_size,
> >>>>>                                       bool zero_region)
> >>>>>  {
> >>>>>      ring->pa = pa;
> >>>>> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static inline void vmxnet3_ring_init(PCIDevice *d,
> >>>>>  }
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  #define VMXNET3_RING_DUMP(macro, ring_name, ridx, r)                   
> >>>>>       \
> >>>>> -    macro("%s#%d: base %" PRIx64 " size %zu cell_size %zu gen %d next 
> >>>>> %zu",  \
> >>>>> +    macro("%s#%d: base %" PRIx64 " size %u cell_size %u gen %d next 
> >>>>> %u",  \
> >>>>>            (ring_name), (ridx),                                         
> >>>>>       \
> >>>>>            (r)->pa, (r)->size, (r)->cell_size, (r)->gen, (r)->next)
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> David, with '-dump-vmstate' with 2.8 machine type and with v2.8 and
> >>>> master I can see the size of "txq_descr" and "rxq_descr" changes because
> >>>> of "sizeof(Vmxnet3TxqDescr)" and "sizeof(Vmxnet3RxqDescr)". This changes
> >>>> because the size of Vmxnet3Ring has changed with the s/size_t/uint32_t/":
> >>>>
> >>>>         {
> >>>>           "field": "txq_descr",
> >>>>           "version_id": 0,
> >>>>           "field_exists": false,
> >>>>           "size": 176
> >>>>         },
> >>>>         {
> >>>>           "field": "rxq_descr",
> >>>>           "version_id": 0,
> >>>>           "field_exists": false,
> >>>>           "size": 216
> >>>>         },
> >>>>
> >>>> becomes:
> >>>>
> >>>>         {
> >>>>           "field": "txq_descr",
> >>>>           "version_id": 0,
> >>>>           "field_exists": false,
> >>>>           "size": 144
> >>>>         },
> >>>>         {
> >>>>           "field": "rxq_descr",
> >>>>           "version_id": 0,
> >>>>           "field_exists": false,
> >>>>           "size": 168
> >>>>         },
> >>>
> >>> But the old migration code used to write these fields using qemu_put_be32
> >>> (from a11f5cb005f9854f0d78da97fc23adf5bc8c83f3)
> >>>
> >>> -static void vmxnet3_put_ring_to_file(QEMUFile *f, Vmxnet3Ring *r)
> >>> -{
> >>> -    qemu_put_be64(f, r->pa);
> >>> -    qemu_put_be32(f, r->size);
> >>> -    qemu_put_be32(f, r->cell_size);
> >>> -    qemu_put_be32(f, r->next);
> >>> -    qemu_put_byte(f, r->gen);
> >>> -}
> >>>
> >>> +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_vmxnet3_ring = {
> >>> +    .name = "vmxnet3-ring",
> >>> +    .version_id = 0,
> >>> +    .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> >>> +        VMSTATE_UINT64(pa, Vmxnet3Ring),
> >>> +        VMSTATE_UINT32(size, Vmxnet3Ring),
> >>> +        VMSTATE_UINT32(cell_size, Vmxnet3Ring),
> >>> +        VMSTATE_UINT32(next, Vmxnet3Ring),
> >>> +        VMSTATE_UINT8(gen, Vmxnet3Ring),
> >>> +        VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> >>> +    }
> >>>  };
> >>>
> >>> so they used to be size_t's written with be32 and now they're uint32_t's
> >>> written as 32bit - so that should be the same.
> >>> I'm not sure i understand where the old txq_descr sizes come from - what
> >>> managed to print the 176 number before it was converted to VMState?
> >>
> >> I think it comes from the sizeof() in VMSTATE_STRUCT(Vmxnet3TxqDescr):
> >>
> >> static const VMStateDescription vmstate_vmxnet3_txq_descr = {
> >>     .name = "vmxnet3-txq-descr",
> >>     .version_id = 0,
> >>     .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> >>         VMSTATE_STRUCT(tx_ring, Vmxnet3TxqDescr, 0, vmstate_vmxnet3_ring,
> >>                        Vmxnet3Ring),
> >>         VMSTATE_STRUCT(comp_ring, Vmxnet3TxqDescr, 0, vmstate_vmxnet3_ring,
> >>                        Vmxnet3Ring),
> >>         VMSTATE_UINT8(intr_idx, Vmxnet3TxqDescr),
> >>         VMSTATE_UINT64(tx_stats_pa, Vmxnet3TxqDescr),
> >>         VMSTATE_STRUCT(txq_stats, Vmxnet3TxqDescr, 0,
> >> vmstate_vmxnet3_tx_stats,
> >>                        struct UPT1_TxStats),
> >>         VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> >>     }
> >> };
> >>
> >> I will check the '-dump-vmstate' code to see if it's relevant.
> > 
> > OK, but that sizeof() should never make it onto the wire; all that
> > teh VMSTATE_STRUCT should do is execute the vmstate_vmxnet3_ring on
> > that data.
> > (And again I'm curious what happened in the version before I committed
> > that change).
> > 
> >>>
> >>>> And if I try a migration, I have:
> >>>>
> >>>> qemu/migration/vmstate.c:112: vmstate_load_state: Assertion `first_elem
> >>>> || !n_elems' failed.
> >>>
> >>> Interesting; that's Halil's new assert; I need to look.
> >>
> >> Can't it be related to the size problem?
> > 
> > It could, I need to see exactly how it's failing; what was the full
> > command line you used, and with what guest?
> 
> Tested with pseries machine type on ppc64le host, no guest started.
> 
> qemu-system-ppc64 -M pseries-2.8 -S -serial mon:stdio -vnc :0 -device
> vmxnet3

QingFeng Hao's <address@hidden> patch:
  'vmstate: fix failed iotests case 68 and 91'
seems to fix that for me.

Dave

> Laurent
> 
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK