[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target/s390x: Fix broken user mode
From: |
David Hildenbrand |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target/s390x: Fix broken user mode |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2017 15:48:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 |
On 16.03.2017 15:46, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Stefan, Richard.
>
> On 03/16/2017 10:28 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 02.03.2017 20:56, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> Am 30.01.2017 um 14:15 schrieb Stefan Weil:
>>>> Returning NULL from get_max_cpu_model results in a SIGSEGV runtime error.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> v2: Re-sent as v1 was damaged by my mailer.
>>>>
>>>> This is also broken in Debian.
>>>>
>>>> In addition, there is no default CPU ("any"), so binfmt and related
>>>> actions currently don't work. I hacked my local installation by
>>>> duplicating the "qemu" cpu definition for "any", but maybe there is
>>>> a better solution.
>>>
>>> That should then already work.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Stefan
>>>>
>>>> target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 2 --
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>>>> index 2a894ee..6e34763 100644
>>>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>>>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu_models.c
>>>> @@ -660,7 +660,6 @@ static void check_compatibility(const S390CPUModel
>>>> *max_model,
>>>>
>>>> static S390CPUModel *get_max_cpu_model(Error **errp)
>>>> {
>>>> -#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>>>> static S390CPUModel max_model;
>>>> static bool cached;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -680,7 +679,6 @@ static S390CPUModel *get_max_cpu_model(Error **errp)
>>>> cached = true;
>>>> return &max_model;
>>>> }
>>>> -#endif
>>>> return NULL;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I thought this was already picked up for stable...
>>> But looks like only the "any" model fixup got.
>>>
>>> So
>>>
>>> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
>>>
>>
>> Ping, can somebody please pick this up?
>
> I see at least two possible changes:
>
> the nasty one to catch bug:
>
> @@ -681,7 +681,7 @@ static S390CPUModel *get_max_cpu_model(Error **errp)
> return &max_model;
> }
> #endif
> - return NULL;
> + abort();
> }
>
> and the nicer one to avoid SIGSEGV:
>
> @@ -734,8 +734,10 @@ void s390_realize_cpu_model(CPUState *cs, Error **errp)
> }
>
> max_model = get_max_cpu_model(errp);
> - if (*errp) {
> - error_prepend(errp, "CPU models are not available: ");
> + if (max_model == NULL) {
> + if (*errp) {
> + error_prepend(errp, "CPU models are not available: ");
> + } else {
> + error_setg(errp, "CPU models are not available");
> + }
> return;
> }
>
As already discussed, user mode should behave just like tcg. No special
handling. So the original patch here is just fine in my opinion.
--
Thanks,
David