|
From: | Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] qga: improve error handling in transfer_memory_block |
Date: | Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:14:59 -0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
On 04/10/2017 10:20 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
Quoting Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2017-04-07 17:20:16)Suggested-by: Michael Roth <address@hidden> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>Reviewed-by: Michael Roth <address@hidden>--- Michael should I use Signed-off-by instead of the Suggested-by (since it is your code)?I suppose it could go either way depending on the circumstances (assuming you've asked for / obtained their SoB obviously), but speaking for myself here I don't think it's necessary.
Ok! I allowed myself to add your "Suggested-by" after reading Linux's process/submitting-patches.rst doc, assuming no need to ask for it since you answered in public ML. I'll diligently ask next time!
qga/commands-posix.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/qga/commands-posix.c b/qga/commands-posix.c index fc45102a1e..ca5a24b2c9 100644 --- a/qga/commands-posix.c +++ b/qga/commands-posix.c @@ -2128,6 +2128,9 @@ static void transfer_memory_block(GuestMemoryBlock *mem_blk, bool sys2memblk, if (errno == ENOENT) { result->response = GUEST_MEMORY_BLOCK_RESPONSE_TYPE_OPERATION_NOT_SUPPORTED; + } else { + result->response = + GUEST_MEMORY_BLOCK_RESPONSE_TYPE_OPERATION_FAILED; } goto out1; } -- 2.11.0
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |