[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/10] blockjob: separate monitor and blockjob A
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/10] blockjob: separate monitor and blockjob APIs |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:57:55 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
On 11/04/2017 00:05, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 04/08/2017 05:52 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/04/2017 08:03, John Snow wrote:
>>> Looks clean, though it may be useful to do a few more things;
>>>
>>> - Demarcate what you think is the monitor API in this file
>>
>> It's already there:
>>
>> +/*
>> + * API for block job drivers and the block layer.
>> + */
>> +
>>
>> where everything before is for the monitor.
>>
>
> I meant explicitly, with a comment at the top explaining the demarcation.
Oh, sure.
>>> - Organize blockjob.h to match to serve as a useful reference.
>>
>> Hmm, yes.
As it turns out, no headers are necessary---but yours was a very good
remark still, because a couple mistakes in this series stood out when
checking.
The "API for block job drivers and the block layer" is already in
blockjob_int.h while the rest is in blockjob.h. This is nice because it
provides some validation of the concept behind the patch, and also of
the locking policy I chose for the rest of the work.
But, there are two exceptions. Both of them are introduced by this
series and they shouldn't be:
- blockjob_pause/resume_all should have its declaration in block_int.h,
so I've fixed patch 4 accordingly
- blockjob_create is in blockjob_int.h, but this patch should move it to
the second part of the file, too.
Thanks,
Paolo