[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 02/20] intel_iommu: exposed extended-context
From: |
Peter Xu |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 02/20] intel_iommu: exposed extended-context mode to guest |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:32:21 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 06:06:32PM +0800, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> VT-d implementations reporting PASID or PRS fields as "Set", must also
> report ecap.ECS as "Set". Extended-Context is required for SVM.
>
> When ECS is reported, intel iommu driver would initiate extended root entry
> and extended context entry, and also PASID table if there is any SVM capable
> device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 131
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h | 9 +++
> include/hw/i386/intel_iommu.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index 400d0d1..bf98fa5 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -497,6 +497,11 @@ static inline bool vtd_root_entry_present(VTDRootEntry
> *root)
> return root->val & VTD_ROOT_ENTRY_P;
> }
>
> +static inline bool vtd_root_entry_upper_present(VTDRootEntry *root)
> +{
> + return root->rsvd & VTD_ROOT_ENTRY_P;
> +}
> +
> static int vtd_get_root_entry(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint8_t index,
> VTDRootEntry *re)
> {
> @@ -509,6 +514,9 @@ static int vtd_get_root_entry(IntelIOMMUState *s, uint8_t
> index,
> return -VTD_FR_ROOT_TABLE_INV;
> }
> re->val = le64_to_cpu(re->val);
> + if (s->ecs) {
> + re->rsvd = le64_to_cpu(re->rsvd);
> + }
I feel it slightly hacky to play with re->rsvd. How about:
union VTDRootEntry {
struct {
uint64_t val;
uint64_t rsvd;
} base;
struct {
uint64_t ext_lo;
uint64_t ext_hi;
} extended;
};
(Or any better way that can get rid of rsvd...)
Even:
struct VTDRootEntry {
union {
struct {
uint64_t val;
uint64_t rsvd;
} base;
struct {
uint64_t ext_lo;
uint64_t ext_hi;
} extended;
} data;
bool extended;
};
Then we read the entry into data, and setup extended bit. A benefit of
it is that we may avoid passing around IntelIOMMUState everywhere to
know whether we are using extended context entries.
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -517,19 +525,30 @@ static inline bool
> vtd_context_entry_present(VTDContextEntry *context)
> return context->lo & VTD_CONTEXT_ENTRY_P;
> }
>
> -static int vtd_get_context_entry_from_root(VTDRootEntry *root, uint8_t index,
> - VTDContextEntry *ce)
> +static int vtd_get_context_entry_from_root(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> + VTDRootEntry *root, uint8_t index, VTDContextEntry *ce)
> {
> - dma_addr_t addr;
> + dma_addr_t addr, ce_size;
>
> /* we have checked that root entry is present */
> - addr = (root->val & VTD_ROOT_ENTRY_CTP) + index * sizeof(*ce);
> - if (dma_memory_read(&address_space_memory, addr, ce, sizeof(*ce))) {
> + ce_size = (s->ecs) ? (2 * sizeof(*ce)) : (sizeof(*ce));
> + addr = (s->ecs && (index > 0x7f)) ?
> + ((root->rsvd & VTD_ROOT_ENTRY_CTP) + (index - 0x80) * ce_size) :
> + ((root->val & VTD_ROOT_ENTRY_CTP) + index * ce_size);
> +
> + if (dma_memory_read(&address_space_memory, addr, ce, ce_size)) {
> trace_vtd_re_invalid(root->rsvd, root->val);
> return -VTD_FR_CONTEXT_TABLE_INV;
> }
> - ce->lo = le64_to_cpu(ce->lo);
> - ce->hi = le64_to_cpu(ce->hi);
> +
> + ce[0].lo = le64_to_cpu(ce[0].lo);
> + ce[0].hi = le64_to_cpu(ce[0].hi);
Again, I feel this even hackier. :)
I would slightly prefer to play the same union trick to context
entries, just like what I proposed to the root entries above...
> +
> + if (s->ecs) {
> + ce[1].lo = le64_to_cpu(ce[1].lo);
> + ce[1].hi = le64_to_cpu(ce[1].hi);
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -595,9 +614,11 @@ static inline uint32_t
> vtd_get_agaw_from_context_entry(VTDContextEntry *ce)
> return 30 + (ce->hi & VTD_CONTEXT_ENTRY_AW) * 9;
> }
>
> -static inline uint32_t vtd_ce_get_type(VTDContextEntry *ce)
> +static inline uint32_t vtd_ce_get_type(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> + VTDContextEntry *ce)
> {
> - return ce->lo & VTD_CONTEXT_ENTRY_TT;
> + return s->ecs ? (ce->lo & VTD_CONTEXT_ENTRY_TT) :
> + (ce->lo & VTD_EXT_CONTEXT_ENTRY_TT);
> }
>
> static inline uint64_t vtd_iova_limit(VTDContextEntry *ce)
> @@ -842,16 +863,20 @@ static int vtd_dev_to_context_entry(IntelIOMMUState *s,
> uint8_t bus_num,
> return ret_fr;
> }
>
> - if (!vtd_root_entry_present(&re)) {
> + if (!vtd_root_entry_present(&re) ||
> + (s->ecs && (devfn > 0x7f) && (!vtd_root_entry_upper_present(&re)))) {
> /* Not error - it's okay we don't have root entry. */
> trace_vtd_re_not_present(bus_num);
> return -VTD_FR_ROOT_ENTRY_P;
> - } else if (re.rsvd || (re.val & VTD_ROOT_ENTRY_RSVD)) {
> - trace_vtd_re_invalid(re.rsvd, re.val);
> - return -VTD_FR_ROOT_ENTRY_RSVD;
> + }
> + if ((s->ecs && (devfn > 0x7f) && (re.rsvd & VTD_ROOT_ENTRY_RSVD)) ||
> + (s->ecs && (devfn < 0x80) && (re.val & VTD_ROOT_ENTRY_RSVD)) ||
> + ((!s->ecs) && (re.rsvd || (re.val & VTD_ROOT_ENTRY_RSVD)))) {
> + trace_vtd_re_invalid(re.rsvd, re.val);
> + return -VTD_FR_ROOT_ENTRY_RSVD;
Nit: I feel like we can better wrap these 0x7f and 0x80 into helper
functions, especially if with above structure change...
(will hold here...)
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/20] Qemu: Extend intel_iommu emulator to support Shared Virtual Memory, Liu, Yi L, 2017/04/26
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/20] intel_iommu: add "svm" option, Liu, Yi L, 2017/04/26
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 04/20] Memory: modify parameter in IOMMUNotifier func, Liu, Yi L, 2017/04/26
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 05/20] VFIO: add new IOCTL for svm bind tasks, Liu, Yi L, 2017/04/26
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 06/20] VFIO: add new notifier for binding PASID table, Liu, Yi L, 2017/04/26
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 07/20] VFIO: check notifier flag in region_del(), Liu, Yi L, 2017/04/26
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 08/20] Memory: add notifier flag check in memory_replay(), Liu, Yi L, 2017/04/26