[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9] Allow setting NUMA distance for different NU
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9] Allow setting NUMA distance for different NUMA nodes |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Apr 2017 11:55:27 +0200 |
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:39:11 +0800
He Chen <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 05:25:51PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:46:26PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 16:05:42 +0200
> > > Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > > On Thu, 27 Apr 2017 07:54:31 -0500
> > > > > Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Markus has asked that all new QMP commands have some testsuite
> > > > >> exposure;
> > > > >> he may have some advice on what test would be best to modify to give
> > > > >> us
> > > > >> some coverage of this feature.
> > > >
> > > > I can't see the QMP command here, but...
> > > >
> > > > > Since it's basically validation of SLIT table, the test case
> > > > > should be added to tests/bios-tables-test.c
> > > >
> > > > ... I figure there's new stuff to test all the same.
> > > it could be a patch on top and doesn't have to hold this one if
> > > author promises to write testcase
> >
> > Agreed. I'm applying this to my machine-next branch, but I would
> > like to get test cases before including it in a pull request.
> >
> You mean we also need a patch to add test case to
> tests/bios-tables-test.c, right? If so, I am very willing to cook and
> submit it.
yes, an additional patch.