[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] memory consumption of Qemu is twice as much as th
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] memory consumption of Qemu is twice as much as the previous version in KVM |
Date: |
Mon, 22 May 2017 10:27:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 |
On 22/05/2017 09:04, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> I found that the latest Qemu eat 2 time memory in KVM since Qemu-2.3.0.
>
> Replication Steps:
>
> 1. I created a CentOS 7 with 4U8G using Qemu-2.3.0,
>
> # grep kvm_kvzalloc /proc/vmallocinfo | awk '{total+=$2}; END {print total}'
> 16932864
> # grep kvm_kvzalloc /proc/vmallocinfo
> 0xffffc900205c7000-0xffffc90020fc8000 10489856 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm]
> pages=2560 vmalloc vpages N1=2560
> 0xffffc90020fc8000-0xffffc90020fce000 24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm]
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc90020fce000-0xffffc90020fd4000 24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm]
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc90020fd4000-0xffffc90020fd8000 16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm]
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc9002438b000-0xffffc9002498c000 6295552 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm]
> pages=1536 vmalloc vpages N1=1536
> 0xffffc9002498c000-0xffffc90024990000 16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm]
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc90024990000-0xffffc90024994000 16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm]
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc90024994000-0xffffc90024997000 12288 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm]
> pages=2 vmalloc N1=2
> 0xffffc90024a75000-0xffffc90024a7e000 36864 kvm_kvzalloc+0x3c/0x40 [kvm]
> pages=8 vmalloc N1=8
>
> PS: There is only this VM in my host.
>
> 2. Do the same test using the latest Qemu:
>
> # grep kvm_kvzalloc /proc/vmallocinfo | awk '{total+=$2}; END {print total}'
> 33865728
> linux-PsHdkO:~ # grep kvm_kvzalloc /proc/vmallocinfo
> 0xffffc9001f181000-0xffffc9001fb82000 10489856 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=2560 vmalloc vpages N1=2560
> 0xffffc9001fb82000-0xffffc9001fb88000 24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc9001fb88000-0xffffc9001fb8e000 24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc9001fb8e000-0xffffc9001fb92000 16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc90020854000-0xffffc90021255000 10489856 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=2560 vmalloc vpages N1=2560
> 0xffffc90021255000-0xffffc9002125b000 24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc9002125b000-0xffffc90021261000 24576 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=5 vmalloc N1=5
> 0xffffc90021261000-0xffffc90021265000 16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc9002616e000-0xffffc90026172000 16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc90026172000-0xffffc90026176000 16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc90026176000-0xffffc90026179000 12288 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=2 vmalloc N1=2
> 0xffffc900261a9000-0xffffc900261ad000 16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc900261ad000-0xffffc900261b1000 16384 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=3 vmalloc N1=3
> 0xffffc900261b1000-0xffffc900261b4000 12288 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=2 vmalloc N1=2
> 0xffffc900280fe000-0xffffc900286ff000 6295552 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=1536 vmalloc vpages N1=1536
> 0xffffc900286ff000-0xffffc90028d00000 6295552 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=1536 vmalloc vpages N1=1536
> 0xffffc90028d87000-0xffffc90028d90000 36864 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=8 vmalloc N1=8
> 0xffffc90028d9c000-0xffffc90028da5000 36864 kvm_kvzalloc+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
> pages=8 vmalloc N1=8
>
>
> 3. I found the first bad commit by 'git biscet'
>
> linux-arei:/mnt/sdb/gonglei/opensource/qemu # git bisect bad
> 6410848bec38089424d54a6a8f10d4cf77182b5d is the first bad commit
> commit 6410848bec38089424d54a6a8f10d4cf77182b5d
> Author: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu Jun 18 18:30:16 2015 +0200
>
> target-i386: register a separate KVM address space including SMRAM regions
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
>
> :040000 040000 b2435d7cd0829e6416b316f1ae2856e6f7b0023d
> 1acb81aecaf50f2d313b33f2b61a24f7f0bd6f07 M target-i386
> linux-PsHdkO:/mnt/sdb/gonglei/opensource/qemu #
>
>
> Any ideas about this change? Do we really need to trigger two times memory
> region allocation?
We are registering two memory maps, so yes as long as "-machine smm=on"
is set. We can skip the second address space if SMM is disabled.
Paolo