[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper |
Date: |
Mon, 22 May 2017 11:09:56 +0200 |
On Mon, 22 May 2017 12:12:46 +1000
David Gibson <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:04:13PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:32:20PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > For historical reasons, we compute CPU device-tree ids with a non-trivial
> > > logic. This patch consolidate the logic in a single helper to be used
> > > in various places where it is currently open-coded.
> > >
> > > It is okay to get rid of DIV_ROUND_UP() because we're sure that the number
> > > of threads per core in the guest cannot exceed the number of threads per
> > > core in the host.
> >
> > However, your new logic still gives different answers in some cases.
> > In particular when max_cpus is not a multiple of smp_threads. Which
> > is generally a bad idea, but allowed for older machine types for
> > compatibility. e.g. smp_threads=4, max_cpus=6 smt=8
> >
> > Old logic:
> > DIV_ROUND_UP(6 * 8, 4)
> > = ⌈48 / 4⌉ = 12
> >
> > New logic gives: ⌊6 / 4⌋ * 8 + (6 % 4)
> > = 1 * 8 + 2
> > = 10
> >
> > In any case the DIV_ROUND_UP() isn't to handle the case where guest
> > threads-per-core is bigger than host threads-per-core, it's (IIRC) for
> > the case where guest threads-per-core is not a factor of host
> > threads-per-core. Again, a bad idea, but I think allowed in some old
> > cases.
>
> Oh, so, the other more general point here is that I actually want to
> get rid of dt_id from the cpu structure. It's basically an abuse of
> the cpu stuff to include what's really an spapr concept - dt IDs for
> powernv are based on the PIR and not allocate the same way.
>
Agreed.
> That said, I'm still ok with a fixed version of this patch as an
> interim step.
>
Well... I'm not sure anymore I need this patch to fix the migration
breakage.
> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > > hw/ppc/spapr.c | 6 ++----
> > > target/ppc/cpu.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > > target/ppc/translate_init.c | 3 +--
> > > 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > index 75e298b4c6be..1bb05a9a6b07 100644
> > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > @@ -981,7 +981,6 @@ static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> > > void *fdt;
> > > sPAPRPHBState *phb;
> > > char *buf;
> > > - int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
> > >
> > > fdt = g_malloc0(FDT_MAX_SIZE);
> > > _FDT((fdt_create_empty_tree(fdt, FDT_MAX_SIZE)));
> > > @@ -1021,7 +1020,7 @@ static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState
> > > *spapr,
> > > _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, 0, "#size-cells", 2));
> > >
> > > /* /interrupt controller */
> > > - spapr_dt_xics(DIV_ROUND_UP(max_cpus * smt, smp_threads), fdt,
> > > PHANDLE_XICP);
> > > + spapr_dt_xics(ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(max_cpus), fdt, PHANDLE_XICP);
> > >
> > > ret = spapr_populate_memory(spapr, fdt);
> > > if (ret < 0) {
> > > @@ -1977,7 +1976,6 @@ static void spapr_init_cpus(sPAPRMachineState
> > > *spapr)
> > > MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
> > > MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> > > char *type = spapr_get_cpu_core_type(machine->cpu_model);
> > > - int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
> > > const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
> > > int boot_cores_nr = smp_cpus / smp_threads;
> > > int i;
> > > @@ -2014,7 +2012,7 @@ static void spapr_init_cpus(sPAPRMachineState
> > > *spapr)
> > > sPAPRDRConnector *drc =
> > > spapr_dr_connector_new(OBJECT(spapr),
> > > SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_CPU,
> > > - (core_id / smp_threads) * smt);
> > > +
> > > ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(core_id));
> > >
> > > qemu_register_reset(spapr_drc_reset, drc);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> > > index 401e10e7dad8..47fe6c64698f 100644
> > > --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
> > > +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> > > @@ -2529,4 +2529,21 @@ int ppc_get_vcpu_dt_id(PowerPCCPU *cpu);
> > > PowerPCCPU *ppc_get_vcpu_by_dt_id(int cpu_dt_id);
> > >
> > > void ppc_maybe_bswap_register(CPUPPCState *env, uint8_t *mem_buf, int
> > > len);
> > > +
> > > +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > > +#include "sysemu/cpus.h"
> > > +#include "target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h"
> > > +
> > > +static inline int ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(int cpu_index)
> > > +{
> > > + /* POWER HV support has an historical limitation that different
> > > threads
> > > + * on a single core cannot be in different guests at the same time.
> > > In
> > > + * order to allow KVM to assign guest threads to host cores
> > > accordingly,
> > > + * CPU device tree ids are spaced by the number of threads per host
> > > cores.
> > > + */
> > > + return (cpu_index / smp_threads) * kvmppc_smt_threads()
> > > + + (cpu_index % smp_threads);
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > #endif /* PPC_CPU_H */
> > > diff --git a/target/ppc/translate_init.c b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > > index 56a0ab22cfbe..837a9a496a65 100644
> > > --- a/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > > +++ b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > > @@ -9851,8 +9851,7 @@ static void ppc_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev,
> > > Error **errp)
> > > }
> > >
> > > #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > > - cpu->cpu_dt_id = (cs->cpu_index / smp_threads) * max_smt
> > > - + (cs->cpu_index % smp_threads);
> > > + cpu->cpu_dt_id = ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(cs->cpu_index);
> > >
> > > if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_vcpu_id_is_valid(cpu->cpu_dt_id)) {
> > > error_setg(errp, "Can't create CPU with id %d in KVM",
> > > cpu->cpu_dt_id);
> > >
> >
>
>
>
pgpO2pqcOG3_u.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] spapr_cpu_core: drop reference on ICP object during CPU realization, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] spapr: fix error reporting in xics_system_init(), Greg Kurz, 2017/05/19
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper, Greg Kurz, 2017/05/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper, David Gibson, 2017/05/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper, David Gibson, 2017/05/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper,
Greg Kurz <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper, Greg Kurz, 2017/05/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper, David Gibson, 2017/05/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper, Greg Kurz, 2017/05/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper, Greg Kurz, 2017/05/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper, David Gibson, 2017/05/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper, David Gibson, 2017/05/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper, Greg Kurz, 2017/05/23
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] spapr: fix migration of ICP objects from/to older QEMU, Greg Kurz, 2017/05/19