Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] hw/i386: Deprecate the machines pc-0.10 to pc-1.2

[Thomas Huth]

On 30.05.2017 12:35, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
>>>  v2:
>>>  - Deprecate machines up to pc-1.2
>>>
>>>  hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 9 +++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>>> index 9f102aa..aace378 100644
>>> --- a/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc_piix.c
>>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>>>  #include "sysemu/kvm.h"
>>>  #include "hw/kvm/clock.h"
>>>  #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>>> +#include "sysemu/qtest.h"
>>>  #include "hw/sysbus.h"
>>>  #include "sysemu/arch_init.h"
>>>  #include "sysemu/block-backend.h"
>>> @@ -84,6 +85,14 @@ static void pc_init1(MachineState *machine,
>>>      MemoryRegion *pci_memory;
>>>      MemoryRegion *rom_memory;
>>>      ram_addr_t lowmem;
>>> +    char *mc_name = MACHINE_CLASS(pcmc)->name;
>>> +
>>> +    /* Machines pc-0.10 up to pc-1.2 are considered as deprecated
>>> */
>>> +    if (!qtest_enabled() && (!strncmp(mc_name, "pc-0.", 5)
>>> +        || (!strncmp(mc_name, "pc-1.", 5) && mc_name[5] < '3'))) {
>>> +        error_report("Machine type '%s' is deprecated, "
>>> +                     "please use a newer type instead", mc_name);
>>> +    }
>>>  
>>>      /*
>>>       * Calculate ram split, for memory below and above 4G.  It's a
>>> bit
>>>
>>
>> Ping! Any comments on this version of the patch?
> 
> Does it make sense to build some infrastructure for this, so we don't
> have ad-hoc code to print deprecation warnings everywhere?
> 
> Something like adding a "bool deprecated" or "char *deprecated_msg"
> field to MachineClass (and possibly elsewhere too, for example
> DeviceClass).

So far we've got deprecation warnings at very different places in the
code - for command line parameters, for HMP commands, for some few
devices, ... and this time it's for the first time for old machine
types. I currently don't see a pattern yet where a "deprecated" flag in
MachineClass or DeviceClass would really help to simplify the code right
now ... maybe later if we deprecate multiple machines at the same time?

 Thomas