[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087 |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:57:07 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 |
On 07/17/2017 10:01 PM, Jing Liu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Do you anybody have iotests failure: 188, 189 and 087 of the latest qemu
> upsteam?
>
> I just wondered if it has something wrong with my test machines because
> I have different results with two machines.
It might help to show the ./check command line you are using, as well as
the errors you are getting. Right now, master is failing on 51, 140,
and 143 when I test across './check -raw', './check -qcow2', and
'./check nbd', but not the three you mention. But the iotests framework
allows a lot more combinations of testing (and we probably have some
lurking testsuite bugs on some of the more exotic combinations).
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087, Jing Liu, 2017/07/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087, John Snow, 2017/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087, Cleber Rosa, 2017/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087, John Snow, 2017/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087, Cleber Rosa, 2017/07/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087, Eric Blake, 2017/07/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087, Jing Liu, 2017/07/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087, Cleber Rosa, 2017/07/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Question for iotests 188, 189 and 087, Jing Liu, 2017/07/19