|
| From: | Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
| Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 46/47] MAINTAINERS: add missing entries for Coccinelle scripts |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Jul 2017 21:43:31 -0300 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 |
On 07/28/2017 08:50 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 28/07/2017 08:24, Fam Zheng wrote:On Fri, 07/28 02:36, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 224890643d..7854792765 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -1537,6 +1537,12 @@ Checkpatch S: Odd Fixes F: scripts/checkpatch.pl+Coccinelle scripts+R: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> +S: Orphan"Orphan" sounds like we don't care much anymore but I suppose this is not the case. But I don't have any better idea either.
M: Mail patches to: FullName <address@hidden>
R: Designated reviewer: FullName <address@hidden>
M: is mail of maintainer
R: is mail of reviewer
S: Status, one of the following:
Maintained: Someone actually looks after it.
Odd Fixes: It has a maintainer but they don't have time
to do much other than throw the odd patch in.
-> Orphan: No current maintainer
"Orphan" sounds the best fit... Do you want to raise it to "Odd Fixes"?
This implies having a maintainer... I don't feel confident enough to Ack
cocci scripts but an incorrect cocci script will not break QEMU so maybe
I cat take M: for Odd Fixes, and lowering it back to Orphan without
maintainer is 1 commit easy :)
Just don't add it to the file. It doesn't have a specific owner.
Paolo you mean don't add the "S: Status" to the MAINTAINERS file, or the "F: *cocci*" entries?
Regards, Phil.
PaoloFam+F: scripts/cocci-macro-file.h +F: scripts/coccinelle/ + Migration M: Juan Quintela <address@hidden> M: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden> @@ -1970,4 +1976,3 @@ Build system architecture M: Daniel P. Berrange <address@hidden> S: Odd Fixes F: docs/devel/build-system.txt
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |