On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 06:55:44PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
Sorry I did not have any time for this last days. And this
to make it worse this is a follow up to something that was
half a year ago. That means I have to re-familiarize myself
with the topic.
If I don't get around to answer in couple of weeks, feel
free to ping me.
Since from what I've seen most of the questions were of type
'Can we do it like this?', maybe sending out a new version
is the best. So people (like me) can read through the whole
thing and point out problems if any.
Regards,
Halil
While two weeks for review is borderline reasonable as an exception, it
does trouble me that we are at v23, for something that is used
in the field so it's not like we can just change things at will.
So I hope everyone concerned makes an effort to try to converge on a spec
ASAP.