[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] List of files containing devices which have not been QO
From: |
Thomas Huth |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] List of files containing devices which have not been QOMified |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Nov 2018 13:39:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
On 2018-11-09 12:29, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 12:17:31PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> I am also suspicious about hw/bt/ but don't know enough
>>> about that subsystem to say if it could benefit from
>>> using QOM objects more.
>>
>> I'm wondering whenever anyone would even notice if we just rm -rf hw/bt
>>
>> Looking through the changelog for the last five years (after hw/ split)
>> the only thing I see is fixing warnings from compiler or coverity,
>> adapting to changes in other systems (chardev for example) and treewide
>> changes. Not a *single* patch specific to bluetooth ...
>
> Tried this after studying docs:
>
> qemu -usb -device usb-bt-dongle -bt hci,vlan=0 -bt device:keyboard
>
> Segfaults right anway on first keypress.
> I guess that qualifies as "broken and obviously unused".
Thanks for checking! I guess that means we could even get rid of it
without deprecating it first if it is broken already for more than two
releases...?
Thomas
- Re: [Qemu-devel] List of files containing devices which have not been QOMified, (continued)