[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1811499] Re: qemu/net/colo-compare.c:288: possible poi
From: |
Zhang Chen |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1811499] Re: qemu/net/colo-compare.c:288: possible pointless code duplication ? |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jan 2019 14:54:09 -0000 |
Have fixed in this patch.
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-01/msg02859.html
Thanks
Zhang Chen
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811499
Title:
qemu/net/colo-compare.c:288: possible pointless code duplication ?
Status in QEMU:
New
Bug description:
qemu/net/colo-compare.c:288] -> [qemu/net/colo-compare.c:296]: (style)
The if condition is the same as the previous if condition
Source code is
if (ppkt->tcp_seq == spkt->tcp_seq && ppkt->seq_end == spkt->seq_end) {
if (colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt,
ppkt->header_size, spkt->header_size,
ppkt->payload_size)) {
*mark = COLO_COMPARE_FREE_SECONDARY | COLO_COMPARE_FREE_PRIMARY;
return true;
}
}
if (ppkt->tcp_seq == spkt->tcp_seq && ppkt->seq_end == spkt->seq_end) {
if (colo_compare_packet_payload(ppkt, spkt,
ppkt->header_size, spkt->header_size,
ppkt->payload_size)) {
*mark = COLO_COMPARE_FREE_SECONDARY | COLO_COMPARE_FREE_PRIMARY;
return true;
}
}
Maybe the second block was supposed to be different ?
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1811499/+subscriptions