[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] checkpatch: Don't emit spurious warnings abo
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] checkpatch: Don't emit spurious warnings about block comments |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:06:45 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 |
On 1/18/19 10:50 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> In checkpatch we attempt to check for and warn about
> block comments which start with /* or /** followed by a
> non-blank. Unfortunately a bug in the regex meant that
> we would incorrectly warn about comments starting with
> "/**" with no following text:
>
> git show 9813dc6ac3954d58ba16b3920556f106f97e1c67|./scripts/checkpatch.pl -
> WARNING: Block comments use a leading /* on a separate line
> #34: FILE: tests/libqtest.h:233:
> +/**
>
> The sequence "/\*\*?" was intended to match either "/*" or "/**",
> but Perl's semantics for '?' allow it to backtrack and try the
> "matches 0 chars" option if the "matches 1 char" choice leads to
> a failure of the rest of the regex to match. Switch to "/\*\*?+"
> which uses what perlre(1) calls the "possessive" quantifier form:
> this means that if it matches the "/**" string it will not later
> backtrack to matching just the "/*" prefix.
>
> The other end of the regex is also wrong: it is attempting
> to check for "/* or /** followed by something that isn't
> just whitespace", but [ \t]*.+[ \t]* will match on pure
> whitespace. This is less significant but means that a line
> with just a comment-starter followed by trailing whitespace
> will generate an incorrect warning about block comment style
> as well as the correct error about trailing whitespace which
> a different checkpatch test emits.
>
Fixes: 8c06fbdf36bf4d4d486116200248730887a4d7d6
> Reported-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> Reported-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
> ---
> # Block comments use /* on a line of its own
> if ($rawline !~ address@hidden/\*.*\*/[ \t]*$@ && #inline
> /*...*/
> - $rawline =~ address@hidden/\*\*?[ \t]*.+[ \t]*$@) { # /* or
> /** non-blank
> + $rawline =~ address@hidden/\*\*?+[ \t]*[^ \t]@) { # /* or
> /** non-blank
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature