[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] vhost-user slave deadlock question
|
From: |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert |
|
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] vhost-user slave deadlock question |
|
Date: |
Fri, 1 Mar 2019 19:05:01 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) |
Hi,
I've added a few commands to vhost-user for virtio-fs and
am hitting a deadlock and am trying to figure out what the correct fix
is; suggestions welcome.
My setup is:
Messages sent over the virtio queues can cause the daemon to need
to send a request back to qemu along the slave, and qemu must respond with an
OK/error. Lets call this command 'setupmapping'.
In my case I'm reading vhost-user commands in one thread and
processing the queues in another.
That normally works OK
My problem:
If qemu crashes or quits it stops the queues synchronously at a point
when the main loop in qemu wont respond to anything else. However
if we're unlucky the daemon has already sent a message to qemu and
is waiting for the response; but that response can't arrive because
qemu is shutting down. So the queue shutdown request never completes.
Then if I kill the daemon forcibly, qemu's handler for the slavefd
wakes up and tries to read data - but it's device has gone and it
crashes.
The trace is:
(Where vuf_* is my device and the structure is pretty much the same
as the others).
vm_state_notify->virtio_set_status->vuf_set_status->vuf_stop->vhost_dev_stop->vhost_virtqueue_stop->vhost_user_get_vring_base->vhost_user_read
So it feels like we need to shut down the slave FD when we shut
down the device; but it's not clear to me at what level.
In some ways it feels like we need a way to get out if this
hole even if we shut down one queue synchronously.
Is anyone fighting similar cases?
Dave
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / address@hidden / Manchester, UK
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Qemu-devel] vhost-user slave deadlock question,
Dr. David Alan Gilbert <=