Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] hw/i386: update copyright notice

[David Kiarie]

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:23 PM Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 04/03/2019 16.13, David Kiarie wrote:
> >
> >                             Hi David,
> >
> >                             On 2/23/19 11:54 AM, David Kiarie wrote:
> >                             > Signed-off-by: David Kiarie
> >                             <address@hidden
> >                             <mailto:address@hidden>>
> >                             > ---
> >                             >  hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 2 +-
> >                             >  hw/i386/amd_iommu.h | 2 +-
> >                             >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
> >                             deletions(-)
> >                             >
> >                             > diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> >                             b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> >                             > index 8ad707a..4f179da 100644
> >                             > --- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> >                             > +++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
> >                             > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
> >                             >   * QEMU emulation of AMD IOMMU (AMD-Vi)
> >                             >   *
> >                             >   * Copyright (C) 2011 Eduard - Gabriel
> >                             Munteanu
> >                             > - * Copyright (C) 2015 David Kiarie,
> >                             <address@hidden
> >                             <mailto:address@hidden>>
> >                             > + * Copyright (C) 2016 David Kiarie
> Kahurani
> >
> >                             Why do you change the year? Because your
> >                             work was merged in 2016?
> >
> >
> >                         no.
> >
> >
> >
> >                     though, if you have a legitimate issue with the
> >                     change, you can always air it.
> >
> >
> >                 you might think random emails are weird but Paolo, i
> >                 don't expect to see any activity from you, on Qemu repo
> >                 before this issue is sorted ;-)
> >
> >
> >             i mostly don't care about this code but i *wrote* it. if i
> >             am not allowed even make such minor(which i not a routine),
> >             why shouldn't i ask you to take the files down?
> >
> >
> >         or, rather, a small issue turns into a scene about how clean
> >         Qemu is. why not take down all my dirty code?
> >
> >
> >     look i'm resending this patch and next time we're having this
> >     conversation, i'll be defacing qemu.
> >
> > either you have to update my code to what i think it should look like or
> > you have to take down - wtf
> >
> > then you try to cook rubbish over it.
>
> Hey, calm down. Paolo said that he'd queue your patch, so it will
> eventually get applied. But that just might take some time, the
> maintainers only send PULL requests for their queued patches after a
> couple of days. So relax, wait some days, and if your patch still did
> not get applied in a week, then you can start complaining again.
>

i'll not complain again, i'm make a patch to clean my code from your
codebase.


>
>  Thomas
>