qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target/ppc: Fix lxvw4x, lxvh8x and lxvb16x


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] target/ppc: Fix lxvw4x, lxvh8x and lxvb16x
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 13:13:44 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0

On 28/05/2019 02:09, David Gibson wrote:

> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 07:53:45AM +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> From: Anton Blanchard <address@hidden>
>>
>> During the conversion these instructions were incorrectly treated as
>> stores. We need to use set_cpu_vsr* and not get_cpu_vsr*.
>>
>> Fixes: 8b3b2d75c7c0 ("introduce get_cpu_vsr{l,h}() and set_cpu_vsr{l,h}() 
>> helpers for VSR register access")
>> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <address@hidden>
>> Reviewed-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <address@hidden>
>> Tested-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
>> Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> 
> Applied, thanks.

I'm in the process of preparing a VSX fixes branch to send over to qemu-stable@ 
so
that Anton's patches make the next 4.0 stable release, however I can't find this
patch in your ppc-for-4.1 branch? Did it get missed somehow?


ATB,

Mark.

>> ---
>>  target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c | 13 +++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c 
>> b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c
>> index 199d22da97..cdb44b8b70 100644
>> --- a/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c
>> +++ b/target/ppc/translate/vsx-impl.inc.c
>> @@ -102,8 +102,7 @@ static void gen_lxvw4x(DisasContext *ctx)
>>      }
>>      xth = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>>      xtl = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>> -    get_cpu_vsrh(xth, xT(ctx->opcode));
>> -    get_cpu_vsrl(xtl, xT(ctx->opcode));
>> +
>>      gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
>>      EA = tcg_temp_new();
>>  
>> @@ -126,6 +125,8 @@ static void gen_lxvw4x(DisasContext *ctx)
>>          tcg_gen_addi_tl(EA, EA, 8);
>>          tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(xtl, EA, ctx->mem_idx, MO_BEQ);
>>      }
>> +    set_cpu_vsrh(xT(ctx->opcode), xth);
>> +    set_cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode), xtl);
>>      tcg_temp_free(EA);
>>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xth);
>>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xtl);
>> @@ -185,8 +186,6 @@ static void gen_lxvh8x(DisasContext *ctx)
>>      }
>>      xth = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>>      xtl = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>> -    get_cpu_vsrh(xth, xT(ctx->opcode));
>> -    get_cpu_vsrl(xtl, xT(ctx->opcode));
>>      gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
>>  
>>      EA = tcg_temp_new();
>> @@ -197,6 +196,8 @@ static void gen_lxvh8x(DisasContext *ctx)
>>      if (ctx->le_mode) {
>>          gen_bswap16x8(xth, xtl, xth, xtl);
>>      }
>> +    set_cpu_vsrh(xT(ctx->opcode), xth);
>> +    set_cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode), xtl);
>>      tcg_temp_free(EA);
>>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xth);
>>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xtl);
>> @@ -214,14 +215,14 @@ static void gen_lxvb16x(DisasContext *ctx)
>>      }
>>      xth = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>>      xtl = tcg_temp_new_i64();
>> -    get_cpu_vsrh(xth, xT(ctx->opcode));
>> -    get_cpu_vsrl(xtl, xT(ctx->opcode));
>>      gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
>>      EA = tcg_temp_new();
>>      gen_addr_reg_index(ctx, EA);
>>      tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(xth, EA, ctx->mem_idx, MO_BEQ);
>>      tcg_gen_addi_tl(EA, EA, 8);
>>      tcg_gen_qemu_ld_i64(xtl, EA, ctx->mem_idx, MO_BEQ);
>> +    set_cpu_vsrh(xT(ctx->opcode), xth);
>> +    set_cpu_vsrl(xT(ctx->opcode), xtl);
>>      tcg_temp_free(EA);
>>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xth);
>>      tcg_temp_free_i64(xtl);
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]