[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migratioin/ram: leave RAMBlock->bmap blank on a
From: |
Wei Yang |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migratioin/ram: leave RAMBlock->bmap blank on allocating |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:33:05 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:34:41AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
>On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 05:43:37PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>> * Wei Yang (address@hidden) wrote:
>> > During migration, we would sync bitmap from ram_list.dirty_memory to
>> > RAMBlock.bmap in cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap().
>> >
>> > Since we set RAMBlock.bmap and ram_list.dirty_memory both to all 1, this
>> > means at the first round this sync is meaningless and is a duplicated
>> > work.
>> >
>> > Leaving RAMBlock->bmap blank on allocating would have a side effect on
>> > migration_dirty_pages, since it is calculated from the result of
>> > cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(). To keep it right, we need to
>> > set migration_dirty_pages to 0 in ram_state_init().
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <address@hidden>
>>
>> I've looked at this for a while, and I think it's OK, so
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <address@hidden>
>>
>> Peter, Juan: Can you just see if there's arny reason this would be bad,
>> but I think it's actually more sensible than what we have.
>
>I really suspect it will work in all cases... Wei, have you done any
>test (or better, thorough tests) with this change? My reasoning of
>why we should need the bitmap all set is here:
>
I have done some migration cases, like migrate a linux guest through tcp.
Other cases suggested to do?
>https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-05/msg07361.html
>
>Regards,
>
>--
>Peter Xu
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migratioin/ram: leave RAMBlock->bmap blank on allocating,
Wei Yang <=