Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: Improve section headlines

[Markus Armbruster]

Stafford Horne <address@hidden> writes:

> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 05:08:52PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> When scripts/get_maintainer.pl reports something like
>> 
>>     John Doe <address@hidden> (maintainer:Overall)
>> 
>> the user is left to wonder *which* of our three "Overall" sections
>> applies.  We have three, one each under "Guest CPU cores (TCG)",
>> "Guest CPU Cores (KVM)", and "Overall usermode emulation".
>> 
>> Rename sections under
>> 
>> * "Guest CPU cores (TCG)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (TCG)"
>> 
>> * "Guest CPU Cores (KVM)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (KVM)"
>> 
>> * "Guest CPU Cores (Xen)" from "FOO" to "FOO CPU cores (Xen)"
>> 
>> * "Architecture support" from "FOO" to "FOO general architecture
>>   support"
>> 
>> * "Tiny Code Generator (TCG)" from "FOO target" to "FOO TCG target"
>> 
>> While there,
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> ... 
>
>> -OpenRISC
>> +OpenRISC CPU cores (TCG)
>>  M: Stafford Horne <address@hidden>
>>  S: Odd Fixes
>>  F: target/openrisc/
>>  F: hw/openrisc/
>>  F: tests/tcg/openrisc/
>>  
>
> As directories listed there I look over both target/ (TCG?) and hw/.

Same for ARM, LM32, MicroBlaze, MIPS, Moxie, ...

> Would it be better to be 'OpenRISC general architecture'?

Valid question.  Peter, do you have an opinion?