qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] "make run-tcg-tests-s390x-linux-user" not working for m


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] "make run-tcg-tests-s390x-linux-user" not working for me
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 09:51:55 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.3.2; emacs 26.1

David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> writes:

> On 04.06.19 09:25, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 04.06.19 09:17, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> for now I was able to run TCG tests using "make
>>> run-tcg-tests-s390x-linux-user". Lately, trying to run the tests always
>>> results in
>>>
>>> t460s: ~/git/qemu vx $ LANG=C make run-tcg-tests-s390x-linux-user
>>> make[1]: Entering directory '/home/dhildenb/git/qemu/slirp'
>>> make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
>>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/dhildenb/git/qemu/slirp'
>>>         CHK version_gen.h
>>>   BUILD   TCG tests for s390x-linux-user
>>>   BUILD   s390x guest-tests SKIPPED
>>>   RUN     TCG tests for s390x-linux-user
>>>   RUN     tests for s390x SKIPPED
>>>
>>> t460s: ~/git/qemu vx $ LANG=C make check-tcg
>>> make[1]: Entering directory '/home/dhildenb/git/qemu/slirp'
>>> make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
>>> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/dhildenb/git/qemu/slirp'
>>>         CHK version_gen.h
>>>   BUILD   TCG tests for s390x-softmmu
>>>   BUILD   s390x guest-tests SKIPPED
>>>   RUN     TCG tests for s390x-softmmu
>>>   RUN     tests for s390x SKIPPED
>>>   BUILD   TCG tests for s390x-linux-user
>>>   BUILD   s390x guest-tests SKIPPED
>>>   RUN     TCG tests for s390x-linux-user
>>>   RUN     tests for s390x SKIPPED
>>>
>>> I am using "./configure --target-list=s390x-softmmu,s390x-linux-user
>>> --enable-sdl --enable-spice --enable-kvm"
>>>
>>> What am I missing? Why is the build skipped?
>>>
>>
>> BTW, docker seems to be working fine, just tried with "make
>> address@hidden J=n"
>>
>
> Turns out I had to rerun ./configure (it didn't include HAVE_USER_DOCKER
> for some reason).

Yeah that was a relatively recent addition rather than dynamically
probing everytime we ran.

>
> Sorry for the noise :)


--
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]