[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jun 2019 12:31:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 |
On 11/06/19 10:56, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Yes, this is how introspection (both QMP and QOM) is commonly used.
> Just keep in mind one difference: QMP is static, QOM is dynamic.
>
> QMP being static means it's defined at compile time. So is the value of
> query-qmp-schema. Same QEMU build, same value. This permits caching.
>
> QOM being dynamic means to introspect an object's properties, you have
> to create it. Worse, an object's properties may (in theory) change at
> any time. *Properties*, not just property *values*. In practice, I'd
> expect properties to change only at realize time.
Right, and we should move more towards class-based properties so that
the dynamic nature of QOM is only used for the bare minimum needed (e.g.
memory regions).
Paolo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Paolo Bonzini, 2019/06/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Natalia Fursova, 2019/06/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Natalia Fursova, 2019/06/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Andreas Färber, 2019/06/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Paolo Bonzini, 2019/06/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Andreas Färber, 2019/06/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Paolo Bonzini, 2019/06/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Andreas Färber, 2019/06/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Paolo Bonzini, 2019/06/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Markus Armbruster, 2019/06/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Markus Armbruster, 2019/06/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Paolo Bonzini, 2019/06/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qgraph, Andreas Färber, 2019/06/11