qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/5] virtio: add "use-started" property


From: Yongji Xie
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/5] virtio: add "use-started" property
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 17:44:33 +0800

On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 at 23:51, Greg Kurz <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:04:10 +0800
> Yongji Xie <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 13:24, Greg Kurz <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:14:30 +0800
> > > Yongji Xie <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 19:45, Greg Kurz <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:31:17 +0800
> > > > > address@hidden wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: Xie Yongji <address@hidden>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In order to avoid migration issues, we introduce a "use-started"
> > > > > > property to the base virtio device to indicate whether use
> > > > > > "started" flag or not. This property will be true by default and
> > > > > > set to false when machine type <= 4.0.1.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Suggested-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <address@hidden>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  hw/block/vhost-user-blk.c  |  4 ++--
> > > > > >  hw/core/machine.c          |  8 ++++++--
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch conflicts with latest upstream changes to 
> > > > > hw_compat_4_0_1[].
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems you need to rebase. Also, I'm still not sure how we're 
> > > > > supposed
> > > > > to handle hw_compat_4_0_1[] versus hw_compat_4_0[]... nobody commented
> > > > > on:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg00637.html
> > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg00641.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe worth to sort that out before re-posting.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > If hw_compat_4_0_1[] is introduced only for q35, I think this patch
> > > > should be OK. If not, maybe we should handle hw_compat_4_0_1[] in
> > > > other machine types (i440fx, arm, ppc, s390)?
> > > >
> > >
> > > It turns out that hw_compat_4_0_1[] isn't needed at all. Please see:
> > >
> > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg03054.html
> > >
> >
> > Oh, great! I will rebase my patch after this commit is merged.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yongji
>
> You can proceed.
>
> https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=8e8cbed09ad9d577955691b4c061b61b602406d1
>

OK, Thank you.

Thanks,
Yongji



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]