Re: [PULL 0/16] Python (acceptance tests) queue, 2019-10-28

[Cleber Rosa]

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 05:58:13PM -0400, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 05:51:28PM -0400, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:13:45PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 23:50, Cleber Rosa <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The following changes since commit 
> > > > aaffb853359829a37daaf883c773e8320b55c723:
> > > >
> > > >   Merge remote-tracking branch 
> > > > 'remotes/maxreitz/tags/pull-block-2019-10-28' into staging (2019-10-28 
> > > > 14:40:01 +0000)
> > > >
> > > > are available in the Git repository at:
> > > >
> > > >   git://github.com/clebergnu/qemu.git tags/python-next-pull-request
> > > >
> > > > for you to fetch changes up to efdb45bfd72745038909dfd1e970a827cb8d5d7e:
> > > >
> > > >   tests/boot_linux_console: Run BusyBox on 5KEc 64-bit cpu (2019-10-28 
> > > > 19:04:04 -0400)
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > Hi; unless my scripts are driving gpg wrong, this seems to
> > > have been signed with an expired gpg key:
> > > 
> > > gpg: Signature made Mon 28 Oct 2019 23:43:11 GMT
> > > gpg:                using RSA key 7ABB96EB8B46B94D5E0FE9BB657E8D33A5F209F3
> > > gpg: Good signature from "Cleber Rosa <address@hidden>" [expired]
> > > gpg: Note: This key has expired!
> > > Primary key fingerprint: 7ABB 96EB 8B46 B94D 5E0F  E9BB 657E 8D33 A5F2 
> > > 09F3
> > > 
> > > 
> > > thanks
> > > -- PMM
> > 
> > Hi Peter,
> > 
> > Nothing wrong with your scripts.  I updated my key about a week ago,
> > but I'm almost certain that the key servers that I sent it to was
> > acting funky.
> > 
> > After some further pushes, I see it on:
> > 
> >   
> > http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&fingerprint=on&search=0x657E8D33A5F209F3
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Search results for '0x657e8d33a5f209f3'
> > Type bits/keyID     cr. time   exp time   key expir
> > pub  4096R/A5F209F3 2014-10-16            
> >      Fingerprint=7ABB 96EB 8B46 B94D 5E0F  E9BB 657E 8D33 A5F2 09F3 
> > 
> > uid Cleber Rosa <address@hidden>
> > sig  sig3  A5F209F3 2014-10-16 __________ 2019-10-15 [selfsig]
> > sig  sig   7657B59A 2014-10-16 __________ __________ Rudá Moura 
> > <address@hidden>
> > sig  sig   2527436A 2019-03-05 __________ __________ Eric Blake 
> > <address@hidden>
> > sig  sig   984DC5A6 2019-03-06 __________ __________ Eduardo Habkost 
> > <address@hidden>
> > sig  sig3  96799EF4 2019-03-06 __________ __________ Bandan Das 
> > <address@hidden>
> > sig  sig3  A5F209F3 2019-10-22 __________ 2024-10-20 [selfsig]
> > 
> > sub  4096R/5B75AD33 2014-10-16            
> > sig sbind  A5F209F3 2014-10-16 __________ 2019-10-15 []
> > sig sbind  A5F209F3 2019-10-22 __________ 2024-10-20 []
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > And with a fresh environment:
> > 
> >   $ podman run --rm -ti fedora:30
> >   [root@afba6c046a22 /]# gpg --search-key 657E8D33A5F209F3
> >   gpg: directory '/root/.gnupg' created
> >   gpg: keybox '/root/.gnupg/pubring.kbx' created
> >   gpg: data source: https://51.38.91.189:443
> >   (1)     Cleber Rosa <address@hidden>
> >             4096 bit RSA key 657E8D33A5F209F3, created: 2014-10-16, 
> > expires: 2024-10-20
> >   Keys 1-1 of 1 for "657E8D33A5F209F3".  Enter number(s), N)ext, or Q)uit > 
> > 1
> >   gpg: key 657E8D33A5F209F3: 4 signatures not checked due to missing keys
> >   gpg: /root/.gnupg/trustdb.gpg: trustdb created
> >   gpg: key 657E8D33A5F209F3: public key "Cleber Rosa <address@hidden>" 
> > imported
> >   gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
> >   gpg: Total number processed: 1
> >   gpg:               imported: 1
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > So I guess "all" you'd need is a refresh.  Sorry for the inconvenience,
> > and let me know if there's anything else I can do.
> > 
> > - Cleber.
> 
> OK, so now I don't see the updated key anymore on the public key servers,
> which confirms that I'm doing something wrong.
> 
> I'm trying to fix that situation.  Sorry for the inconvenience again.
> 
> - Cleber.

I'm now getting the updated key on every single server I've tried.

Any further feedback/request is highly appreciated.

Thanks,
- Cleber.