qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 0/1] Introduce Xlnx ZynqMP CAN controller for QEMU


From: Jason Wang
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Introduce Xlnx ZynqMP CAN controller for QEMU
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:48:24 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0


On 2020/2/5 上午11:23, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
Hi Jason,
Yes, I will maintain this NIC. Thanks for the help.

Regards,
Vikram


Good to know that.

Please update MAINTINERS and it would be better if you can draft a qtest for this NIC.

I leave some quick comments for the patch and I hope the patch could be reviewed by others as well.

Thanks



-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Wang <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2020 7:17 PM
To: Vikram Garhwal <address@hidden>; address@hidden
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Introduce Xlnx ZynqMP CAN controller for QEMU


On 2020/2/4 上午5:06, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
Example for single CAN:
      -object can-bus,id=canbus0 \
      -global driver=xlnx.zynqmp-can,property=canbus0,value=canbus0 \
      -object can-host-socketcan,id=socketcan0,if=vcan0,canbus=canbus0

Example for connecting both CAN:
      -object can-bus,id=canbus0 -object can-bus,id=canbus1 \
      -global driver=xlnx.zynqmp-can,property=canbus0,value=canbus0 \
      -global driver=xlnx.zynqmp-can,property=canbus1,value=canbus1 \
      -object can-host-socketcan,id=socketcan0,if=vcan0,canbus=canbus0 \
      -object can-host-socketcan,id=socketcan1,if=vcan0,canbus=canbus1

Vikram Garhwal (1):
    hw/net/can: Introduce Xlnx ZynqMP CAN controller for QEMU

   hw/net/can/Makefile.objs         |    1 +
   hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c     | 1106
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   include/hw/net/xlnx-zynqmp-can.h |   77 +++
   3 files changed, 1184 insertions(+)
   create mode 100644 hw/net/can/xlnx-zynqmp-can.c
   create mode 100644 include/hw/net/xlnx-zynqmp-can.h

Hi Vikram:

I would like to confirm that whether or not you would maintain this NIC.
(I think the answer is yes). I tend not to merge a NIC model without a
maintainer.

Thanks




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]