qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug 1823790] Re: QEMU mishandling of SO_PEERSEC forces systemd into tig


From: zebul666
Subject: [Bug 1823790] Re: QEMU mishandling of SO_PEERSEC forces systemd into tight loop
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2020 12:03:59 -0000

Well, it's kind of irrelevant but I am trying that on archlinux and this
does not work for me.

Using systemd-244.2-1 and qemu-user-static-4.2 that I built with
Laurent's patch. May be I have done something wrong ?

I still get that error that leads me here:

Failed to enqueue loopback interface start request: Operation not supported
Caught <SEGV>, dumped core as pid 3.
Exiting PID 1...

I am trying to boot with systemd-nspawn an archlinux-arm built for a
rpi0. That's fine if I don't boot it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1823790

Title:
  QEMU mishandling of SO_PEERSEC forces systemd into tight loop

Status in QEMU:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  While building Debian images for embedded ARM target systems I
  detected that QEMU seems to force newer systemd daemons into a tight
  loop.

  My setup is the following:

  Host machine: Ubuntu 18.04, amd64
  LXD container: Debian Buster, arm64, systemd 241
  QEMU: qemu-aarch64-static, 4.0.0-rc2 (custom build) and 3.1.0 (Debian 
1:3.1+dfsg-7)

  To easily reproduce the issue I have created the following repository:
  https://github.com/lueschem/edi-qemu

  The call where systemd gets looping is the following:
  2837 getsockopt(3,1,31,274891889456,274887218756,274888927920) = -1 errno=34 
(Numerical result out of range)

  Furthermore I also verified that the issue is not related to LXD.
  The same behavior can be reproduced using systemd-nspawn.

  This issue reported against systemd seems to be related:
  https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/11557

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1823790/+subscriptions



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]