qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL SUBSYSTEM qemu-pseries] pseries: Update SLOF firmware image


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [PULL SUBSYSTEM qemu-pseries] pseries: Update SLOF firmware image
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:43:57 +1100

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 03:09:46PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 18/02/2020 16:48, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 2/17/20 11:46 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:24:11AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>> On 2/17/20 10:26 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>>> Hi Alexey,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2/17/20 3:12 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>>>> The following changes since commit
> >>>>> 05943fb4ca41f626078014c0327781815c6584c5:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     ppc: free 'fdt' after reset the machine (2020-02-17 11:27:23
> >>>>> +1100)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> are available in the Git repository at:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     address@hidden:aik/qemu.git tags/qemu-slof-20200217
> >>>>>
> >>>>> for you to fetch changes up to
> >>>>> ea9a03e5aa023c5391bab5259898475d0298aac2:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     pseries: Update SLOF firmware image (2020-02-17 13:08:59 +1100)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy (1):
> >>>>>         pseries: Update SLOF firmware image
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    pc-bios/README   |   2 +-
> >>>>>    pc-bios/slof.bin | Bin 931032 -> 968560 bytes
> >>>>>    roms/SLOF        |   2 +-
> >>>>>    3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> I only received the cover, not the patch, have you posted it?
> >>>
> >>> OK I see the SLOF binary is almost 1MB. Maybe this got blocked by spam
> >>> filter. FYI you can use 'git-format-patch --no-binary' to emit the patch
> >>> with the commit description but without the content.
> >>
> >> Generally Alexey sends SLOF updates to me just as pull requests
> >> without patches in full, because a huge slab of base64 encoded
> >> firmware isn't particularly illuminating.
> > 
> > I understand, this is why I later suggested Alexey to use
> > 'git-format-patch --no-binary', because Laszlo uses it for EDK2
> > submodule, this allow to quickly review the change on the list (without
> > posting the base64), see:
> > 
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg624429.html
> > (pull-request cover)
> > 
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg624432.html
> > "roms/edk2: update submodule"
> > 
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg624435.html
> > "pc-bios: refresh edk2 build artifacts"
> 
> I am not quite sure where to fit this "git-format-patch". I run now "git
> request-pull" and "git send-email" so am I expected to run format-patch
> and post it as a patchset but with the pull request mail as a cover
> letter? This does not seem very useful though. For today, I'll add the
> change log to the pull request mail. Thanks,

Most git format-patch options can also be passed to git send-email,
and it will pass them through.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]