qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] target/arm: Fix wrong use of FIELD_EX32 on ID_AA64DFR0


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] target/arm: Fix wrong use of FIELD_EX32 on ID_AA64DFR0
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 18:48:08 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1

On 2/24/20 6:28 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
We missed an instance of using FIELD_EX32 on a 64-bit ID
register, in isar_feature_aa64_pmu_8_4(). Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <address@hidden>
---
  target/arm/cpu.h | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 65171cb30ee..b647d8df916 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -3723,8 +3723,8 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pmu_8_1(const 
ARMISARegisters *id)
static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pmu_8_4(const ARMISARegisters *id)
  {
-    return FIELD_EX32(id->id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, PMUVER) >= 5 &&
-        FIELD_EX32(id->id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, PMUVER) != 0xf;
+    return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, PMUVER) >= 5 &&
+        FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, PMUVER) != 0xf;
  }
/*


Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]