[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RFC PATCH v2 5/5] test-crypto-secret: add 'syskey' object tests.
|
From: |
Alexey Krasikov |
|
Subject: |
[RFC PATCH v2 5/5] test-crypto-secret: add 'syskey' object tests. |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Apr 2020 01:25:25 +0300 |
* test_secret_seckey_bad_key_access_right() is not working yet.
We don't know yet if this due a bag in the Linux kernel or
whether it's normal syscall behavior.
We've requested information from kernel maintainer.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Krasikov <address@hidden>
---
tests/test-crypto-secret.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 138 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/test-crypto-secret.c b/tests/test-crypto-secret.c
index 13fc6c4c75..6b17fe3a81 100644
--- a/tests/test-crypto-secret.c
+++ b/tests/test-crypto-secret.c
@@ -22,8 +22,10 @@
#include "crypto/init.h"
#include "crypto/secret.h"
+#include "crypto/linux_keyring.h"
#include "qapi/error.h"
#include "qemu/module.h"
+#include <keyutils.h>
static void test_secret_direct(void)
{
@@ -125,6 +127,132 @@ static void test_secret_indirect_emptyfile(void)
}
+#define DESCRIPTION "qemu_test_secret"
+#define PAYLOAD "Test Payload"
+
+
+static void test_secret_seckey_good(void)
+{
+ char key_str[16];
+ Object *sec;
+ key_serial_t key = add_key("user", DESCRIPTION, PAYLOAD,
+ strlen(PAYLOAD), KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING);
+
+ g_assert(key >= 0);
+
+ snprintf(key_str, sizeof(key_str), "0x%08x", key);
+ sec = object_new_with_props(
+ TYPE_QCRYPTO_SECRET_LINUX_KEYRING,
+ object_get_objects_root(),
+ "sec0",
+ &error_abort,
+ "serial", key_str,
+ NULL);
+
+ assert(0 <= keyctl_unlink(key, KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING));
+ char *pw = qcrypto_secret_lookup_as_utf8("sec0",
+ &error_abort);
+ g_assert_cmpstr(pw, ==, PAYLOAD);
+
+ object_unparent(sec);
+ g_free(pw);
+}
+
+
+static void test_secret_seckey_revoked_key(void)
+{
+ char key_str[16];
+ Object *sec;
+ key_serial_t key = add_key("user", DESCRIPTION, PAYLOAD,
+ strlen(PAYLOAD), KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING);
+ g_assert(key >= 0);
+ g_assert_false(keyctl_revoke(key));
+
+ snprintf(key_str, sizeof(key_str), "0x%08x", key);
+ sec = object_new_with_props(
+ TYPE_QCRYPTO_SECRET_LINUX_KEYRING,
+ object_get_objects_root(),
+ "sec0",
+ NULL,
+ "serial", key_str,
+ NULL);
+
+ g_assert(errno == EKEYREVOKED);
+ g_assert(sec == NULL);
+
+ keyctl_unlink(key, KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING);
+}
+
+
+static void test_secret_seckey_expired_key(void)
+{
+ char key_str[16];
+ Object *sec;
+ key_serial_t key = add_key("user", DESCRIPTION, PAYLOAD,
+ strlen(PAYLOAD), KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING);
+ g_assert(key >= 0);
+ g_assert_false(keyctl_set_timeout(key, 1));
+ sleep(1);
+
+ snprintf(key_str, sizeof(key_str), "0x%08x", key);
+ sec = object_new_with_props(
+ TYPE_QCRYPTO_SECRET_LINUX_KEYRING,
+ object_get_objects_root(),
+ "sec0",
+ NULL,
+ "serial", key_str,
+ NULL);
+
+ g_assert(errno == EKEYEXPIRED);
+ g_assert(sec == NULL);
+
+ keyctl_unlink(key, KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING);
+}
+
+
+static void test_secret_seckey_bad_serial_key(void)
+{
+ Object *sec;
+
+ sec = object_new_with_props(
+ TYPE_QCRYPTO_SECRET,
+ object_get_objects_root(),
+ "sec0",
+ NULL,
+ "serial", "1",
+ NULL);
+
+ g_assert(errno == ENOKEY);
+ g_assert(sec == NULL);
+}
+
+
+static void test_secret_seckey_bad_key_access_right(void)
+{
+ char key_str[16];
+ Object *sec;
+ key_serial_t key = add_key("user", DESCRIPTION, PAYLOAD,
+ strlen(PAYLOAD), KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING);
+ g_assert(key >= 0);
+ g_assert_false(keyctl_setperm(key, KEY_POS_ALL & (~KEY_POS_READ)));
+
+ snprintf(key_str, sizeof(key_str), "0x%08x", key);
+
+ sec = object_new_with_props(
+ TYPE_QCRYPTO_SECRET_LINUX_KEYRING,
+ object_get_objects_root(),
+ "sec0",
+ NULL,
+ "serial", key_str,
+ NULL);
+
+ g_assert(errno == EACCES);
+ g_assert(sec == NULL);
+
+ keyctl_unlink(key, KEY_SPEC_PROCESS_KEYRING);
+}
+
+
static void test_secret_noconv_base64_good(void)
{
Object *sec = object_new_with_props(
@@ -425,6 +553,16 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
test_secret_indirect_badfile);
g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/indirect/emptyfile",
test_secret_indirect_emptyfile);
+ g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/seckey/good",
+ test_secret_seckey_good);
+ g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/seckey/revoked_key",
+ test_secret_seckey_revoked_key);
+ g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/seckey/expired_key",
+ test_secret_seckey_expired_key);
+ g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/seckey/bad_serial_key",
+ test_secret_seckey_bad_serial_key);
+ g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/seckey/bad_key_access_right",
+ test_secret_seckey_bad_key_access_right);
g_test_add_func("/crypto/secret/noconv/base64/good",
test_secret_noconv_base64_good);
--
2.17.1
- [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] crypto/secret: rename to secret_interface., Alexey Krasikov, 2020/04/15
- [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] test-crypto-secret: add 'syskey' object tests.,
Alexey Krasikov <=
- [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] crypto/linux_keyring: add 'syskey' secret object., Alexey Krasikov, 2020/04/15
- [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] crypto/secret_interface: conversion to common basic class., Alexey Krasikov, 2020/04/15
- [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] crypto/secret: add secret class files., Alexey Krasikov, 2020/04/15
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] crypto/secret: rename to secret_interface., Markus Armbruster, 2020/04/16
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] crypto/secret: rename to secret_interface., Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/04/22