[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
Subject: |
Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2 |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Aug 2020 10:06:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.14.5 (2020-06-23) |
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 11:02:34AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> [...]
> >> I think it's now time to plan the end game, preferably without even more
> >> weeks of intense rebasing.
> >>
> >> Do we have consensus to move forward with Meson? If yes, I'd like to
> >> propose to aim for merging as early as practical in the 5.2 cycle.
> >> Rationale: rebasing build system changes on top of the Meson work is
> >> probably easier than rebasing the Meson work, and avoids turning Paolo
> >> into an overworked bottleneck.
> >>
> >> In more detail:
> >>
> >> 1. Pick a tentative deadline.
> >
> > I'd suggest we need a bare minimum of half a development cycle to.
> > So if we want it tin 5.2, we need to make a strong push now and over
> > next month to review it and iron out any obvious blocking testing
> > problems.
>
> I had less than a "now and over next month" (>7 weeks!) in mind.
To be clear, I'm not recommending we wait that long - I'm just
suggesting that is an upper bound after which we'd really need
to wait for the dev cycle after.
Ideally we would make a strong push to get it merged just 2 weeks
after this release, ie by early september.
> The choice of deadline is really about how much of Paolo's time we are
> (and he is!) willing to spend on rebasing vs. how much risk of toothing
> problems in master we are willing to accept.
>
> "First thing after 5.2 opens" would be ideal from a "avoid more
> rebasing" point of view, but it may not be practical.
>
> Once the flood gates are open, we can probably just as well wait for the
> initial flood to subside.
All depends how quickly Paolo thinks it get to mergeable state....
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, (continued)
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Yonggang Luo, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Alex Bennée, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Alex Bennée, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/08/07
Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Markus Armbruster, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Peter Maydell, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Alex Bennée, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Peter Maydell, 2020/08/07
Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/08/07