[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2 |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Aug 2020 11:28:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 |
On 07/08/20 11:18, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> If we bundle Meson, there's a risk that we see a new shiny feature
> in next meson, and bump our sub-module to the next release. And
> again. And again. And again. If we do that we'll never get to a
> place where we can rely on distro Meson. That will be bad.
>
> So I think we need to be very mindful of this and strongly resist
> the urge to further increase our min meson version in future.
Agreed. Marc-André has a couple patches left, but they're just nice to
have. Another possibility could be adding first-class Sphinx support to
Meson (e.g. parsing the conf.py file to figure out the manpages directly).
Otherwise, 0.55.0 (or 0.56.0 if we want to avoid the warnings) should
have all that we need, and we're already doing some pretty complicated
things.
Paolo
Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Peter Maydell, 2020/08/07
Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2020/08/07
Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Thomas Huth, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Thomas Huth, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Thomas Huth, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Thomas Huth, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Thomas Huth, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Paolo Bonzini, 2020/08/07
- Re: [DRAFT PATCH 000/143] Meson integration for 5.2, Thomas Huth, 2020/08/07